My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-01-95 Planning Comm. Workshop Minutes
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1995
>
11-01-95 Planning Comm. Workshop Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2009 11:54:40 AM
Creation date
5/26/2009 11:31:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Architectural Elements <br />The workshop participants began the discussion of architectural elements by reviewing an <br />extensive lisf of possible elements to consider regulating. Issues to be resolved about <br />each of the issues include (1) whether the element should be included in the guidelines, <br />(2) what aspects of each element participants liked or disliked, and (3) whether the extent <br />of the City's review would be at the policy level or actual regulation of the element itself. <br />It was also agreed that the City should view the architectural needs from along-term <br />perspective, and that a design which would be "timeless" is the ultimate objective of these <br />guidelines. <br />The committee made the following recommendations regarding the potential architectural <br />elements: <br />• Building massing should present varied levels and mass to the street. <br />• There should be breaks in the building massing, both through the block to the <br />parking in back, and by varying the setback of building facades from the curb. <br />• There should be a variation in building heights and number of stories. <br />• Corner buildings should express an "anchor" massing by being larger and/or higher. <br />• Buildings should identify a visual focal point as entries to the development as a <br />whole. <br />• The "bays" of the buildings should present a varied width along the street, but <br />should complement each other. <br />• The bays should accommodate future expansion, and possible changes in tenants. <br />• The width of the bay of a building should exceed the height of the base to create <br />a mare solid look to the individual bays. <br />• Height of the building base should be complementary from bay to bay. <br />• There should be more window than wall space at street level. <br />• Entrances to buildings should vary from the building line, and could include flush <br />entrances as well as recessed entrances. <br />• Canopies and awnings will need further discussion. <br />• The shaft, or upper floors above the base, of the building should accommodate <br />varied uses, including both office and residential spaces. <br />• Window area in the upper stories should be consistent from building to building. <br />• Crowns of buildings should be decorative and distinctive. <br />• Materials should be natural and complementary to the other building materials. <br />• Roof form: Mostly flat, although the committee wanted to see examples which <br />would illustrate sloping roofs or a combination of flat and sloping rooflines. <br />Streetscape Elements <br />The committee discussed the need to create an environment which accommodates <br />vehicles easily and efficiently, but made pedestrians feel comfortable walking in and <br />through the project. A character reflecting charm and non-contemporary environments was <br />desired, with a significant amount of vegetation and open space. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.