My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-11-09 Planning Comm. Agenda
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2009
>
06-11-09 Planning Comm. Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/2/2009 10:16:36 AM
Creation date
6/3/2009 3:45:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The City must make the determination as to the degree of hardship with regard to this <br />application. The six-foot tall fence allows the motion detector security system to work at <br />its fullest potential, which provides peace of mind to the property owners. The fence <br />provides a certain level of security, privacy, and protection, which is not an <br />unreasonable use of a residential property. <br />Granting the variance and allowing the fence to be taller than four feet in height does <br />not grant any special privileges to the property owners, but provides the applicant rights, <br />such as safety and protection, which are commonly enjoyed by other properties in the <br />same district. In addition, the special conditions and circumstances that exist on this <br />property are not economic in nature, nor have they resulted from the actions of the <br />applicant/property owners. Therefore, it appears that a genuine hardship does exist in <br />complying with the literal terms of the Ordinance. <br />Summary and Recommendation <br />Planning staff believes that the applicant has demonstrated the required hardship to <br />justify approval of a six-foot tall fence. This conclusion is based on the following <br />findings of fact: <br />A. The proposed action will not: impair an adequate supply of light and air to <br />adjacent property; increase the congestion in the public street; increase the <br />danger of fire or endanger the public safety; diminish or impair established <br />property values within the neighborhood, or in any way be contrary to the intent <br />of this Ordinance; or violate the intent and purpose of the City Comprehensive <br />Plan; <br />B. The proposed variance will assist in making reasonable use of the properties; <br />and <br />C. A genuine hardship exists in complying with the literal terms of the Ordinance, as <br />presented in the previous section titled, "Conclusion." <br />And subject to the following conditions: <br />1) Applicant shall receive a fence permit through the City; <br />2) The exact distance of the fence to the front property Tine/right-of-way shall be <br />submitted to the City through a revised site plan. (Applicant shall verify the <br />location of the existing property lines through locating the property corners or <br />submitting a survey); and <br />3) The City Building Official shall inspect the location and construction of the fence. <br />pc. Kathy Glanzer <br />Lee Elfering <br />Steve Westerhaus <br />Michael Pelzer, 2849 Centerville Rd, Little Canada, MN <br />Afroz Khan, 2837 Centerville Rd, Little Canada, MN <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.