Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />2023-001 Limited Segregation of Duties <br /> <br />Condition: During our audit we reviewed procedures over cash disbursements, payroll, utility billing, financial <br />reporting, and capital assets and found the City to have limited segregation of duties over those <br />transaction cycles. <br /> <br />Criteria: There are four general categories of duties: authorization, custody, record keeping and <br />reconciliation. In an ideal system, different employees perform each of these four major <br />functions. In other words, no one person has control of two or more of these responsibilities. <br /> <br />Cause: As a result of the limited number of staff, in the disbursement cycle, the finance director has <br />access to checks, ability to posts to the general ledger, and prepares bank reconciliations. In the <br />payroll cycle, the finance director has control over the payroll system, sets up employee records, <br />posts to the general ledger. In the utility billing cycle, the City Council approves rates but the <br />finance director reconciles the amounts billed and collected in the system and has the ability to <br />post to the general ledger. The majority of the collections of utility payments are now collected <br />electronically, however the Finance director is responsible for all the recording and reconciling. In <br />the financial reporting and capital asset transaction cycles, the Finance director performs all of <br />the duties. <br /> <br />Effect: The existence of this limited segregation of duties increases the risk of fraud. <br /> <br />Recommendation: While we recognize the number of staff is not large enough to eliminate this deficiency, we <br />recommend that the City evaluate the current procedures and segregate duties where possible <br />and implement any compensating controls. We are aware some compensating controls are in <br />place; however, it is important that the City Council is aware of this cond ition and monitor all <br />financial information. <br /> <br />Management Response: <br /> <br />Management recognizes that it is not economically feasible to correct this finding, however, is aware of the deficiency and <br />is relying on oversight by management and the City Council to monitor this deficiency. <br /> <br />Compliance and Other Matters <br /> <br />As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether the City’s financial statements are free of material <br />misstatement, we performed tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts and grants, <br />and noncompliance with which could have a direct and material effect on the financial statements. However, providing an <br />opinion on compliance with those provisions was not an objective of our audit. Also, in accordance wi th the Uniform <br />Guidance, we examined, on a test basis, evidence about the City’s compliance with the types of compliance requirements <br />described in the “U.S. Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Compliance Supplement” applicable to each of its major <br />Federal programs for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the City’s compliance with those requirements and for <br />compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of its federal awards applicable to its federal <br />programs. While our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion, it does not provide a legal determination on the <br />City’s compliance with those requirements. The results of our tests disclosed no instances of noncompliance or other <br />matters that are required to be reported in accordance with the Uniform Guidance, Government Auditing Standards or <br />Minnesota statues. <br /> <br />Qualitative Aspects of Accounting Practices <br /> <br />Management is responsible for the selection and use of appropriate accounting policies. The significant accounting <br />policies used by the City are described in Note 1 to the financial statements . No new accounting policies were adopted <br />and the application of existing policies were not changed during the year ended December 31, 2023. We noted no <br />transactions entered into by the City during the year for which there is a lack of authoritative guidance or consensus. All <br />significant transactions have been recognized in the financial statements in the proper period. <br />DRAFT <br />3