My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5-12-76 Meeting Attachment
>
City Council Packets
>
1975-1979
>
1976
>
1976 Meeting Attachments
>
5-12-76 Meeting Attachment
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/24/2024 4:14:10 PM
Creation date
9/24/2024 2:30:49 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
May 12, 1976 <br />City of Little Canada <br />Ramsey County, Minnesota <br />Att'n: Mayor Donald Valento and Councilmen <br />Gentlemen: <br />I wish to obtain permission to make the following changes <br />in Lots 26 and 27 of Auditor's Subdivision ao. 43 and Plat 03700 (di- <br />viding into three (3) lots) as follows: <br />PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Auditor's Subdivis io:i No. 43 of the South 341 <br />feet of Lot 26. <br />1. The North 130 feet of the South 341 feet of Lot 26 (my dwelling <br />now on this piece, known as 2666 Edgerton). <br />2. The North 90 feet of the South 211 feet of Lot 26. <br />3. The South 121 feet of Lot 26. <br />PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Auditor's Subdivision No. 43 of the South 359 <br />feet of Lot 27 (Lake Shore). <br />1 (A) The North 115 feet of the South 359 feet of Lot 27. <br />2 (A) The North 90 feet of the South 244 feet of Lot 26. <br />3 (A) The South 154 feet of Lot 26. <br />It would be my intention tcl have .lots 1 and 1(A) <br />combined into .one (1) parcel of land. The same for lots 2 and 2)(r: <br />and 3 and 3 (A). This would then show the properties with the Lake <br />Shore lot running parallel with the building lot as closely as <br />possible. There may be slight changes in final property lines, when <br />survey is completed, to comply with the natural line of shrubbery and <br />trees - but there should not be over 10 feet difference from the above <br />proposal. <br />I would also like an opinion at this time as to "variances-" <br />which might be granted in set back lines with reference to Lots two (2) <br />and three (3). If variance not possible in these Lots -:mot would make the <br />dwellings which might be built on these Lots unattractive and undesirable <br />to the area in keeping the area attractive and an asset to the City of <br />Little Canada. This would be especially true in the case of Lot three (3). <br />Your decision and suggestions as Co the above matters would <br />be appreciated. Wish to express my thanks, for your tiYue and consideration. <br />Yours very truly, <br />Robert A. Menge <br />Clerk's exhibit no. 416 <br />meeting 5-12-76 <br />4 V)` <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.