My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-12-77 Meeting Attachment
>
City Council Packets
>
1975-1979
>
1977
>
1977 Meeting Attachments
>
10-12-77 Meeting Attachment
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/24/2024 4:31:11 PM
Creation date
9/24/2024 2:42:53 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
___ � uuc PL tmises <br />That part of the SE4 of Section 311 Township 0 <br />lying northeasterly of Interstate Hi wa ( 43 ., Range 22 <br />westerly of Twin Lake and northerlyy 9 and south - <br />Northern Railway right -Of -way the Burlington <br />Northernas follows; and southeasterly of a line <br />south commencing at a point on the north - <br />Quarter section line and 1864 feet south from the <br />northweE t corner of said SSE,I; thence south 64040' east <br />115 feet; thence north 690521 east 1105 feet; thence o <br />280381 east 150 feet to the beginning s uth <br />described; thence north 052= g � °f the line to be <br />east 590 feet, more of less <br />to the shore of Twin Lake <br />it is hereby requested that the City of Little Canada <br />their premises. The power of the <br />Minnesota Statutes 412.221 and 429City Council to o open a public street to <br />. Pen a street is under <br />Both the Constitution of the State of Minnesota and Statutes <br />that private land may not be taken in eminent domain for hold <br />ever,. as early as 1912 in the case of Mueller v. 02e Sua private use. How - <br />of CouY'tland, reported in 117 Minn. Reports, page 2 o Supervisors of the Town <br />Minnesota Supreme Court specifically held the fact hatla5 r W. �9 ' the <br />to be constructed solely for the proposed public road <br />from the premises of a single landowner, of furnishing ingress and egress <br />� , and is to be located entirely <br />the premises of another, did not violate this constitutional PrAhibition. The Court stated at Page 295. and statutory <br />"On the other hand, when a road like the one in question <br />- regarded from the public's vie Q is <br />mere immediate convenience thereof to tihtewould seem that the <br />benefited thz•eb Yas distinguished Person most directly <br />� nguished from the public at large, <br />is not conclusive of its <br />character, so as to render the ttaking <br />aOfianonst its public <br />thereof a talon fora mother s property <br />has an interest in too pmany twausetofre or the public undoubtedly <br />Y cite in ha v 0 , v1. access � r <br />to each and everyone of the members thereof." <br />- �n <br />SEP 2=- 1977 <br />CLERK'S EXHIBIT N0. 12 i <br />MEETING. 10.. 12-77 CITY i,;.- <br />JJTTLE CANAQ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.