My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-14-2023-Planning Commission Packet
>
Agenda Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2023
>
12-14-2023-Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/27/2024 10:14:24 AM
Creation date
9/27/2024 10:12:41 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />PLANNING COMMISSION <br />SEPTEMBER 14, 2023 <br />5 <br />Chair Johnson noted that was discussed at the last meeting and there is nothing preventing <br />dressing of a deer on private property, therefore someone should be able to do the same for a <br />chicken. She commented that commercial operation would not be allowed on residential <br />property. She confirmed the consensus that butchering for personal use would be allowed not in <br />the view of the public and commercial operation would not be allowed. <br />Commissioner Carlson-Clark referenced the commercial statement and noted that people <br />sometimes want to sell the eggs. He asked if that would be allowed. <br />Chair Johnson stated that she would support people sharing their eggs, but she would not want to <br />create commercial endeavors. <br />Commissioner Boe-Schmidt referenced the use of the word drake and suggested that the <br />waterfowl language be removed as that is not going to be allowed at this time. It was suggested <br />that drake be changed to fowl. <br />Chair Johnson suggested a language change to ensure people are not feeding turkeys. <br />Chair Johnson welcomed input from the public. <br />Leanne Love, 555 Little Canada Road E, referenced the condition related to slaughtering and <br />asked for clarification on culling using the example of disease. She asked if the entire yard needs <br />to be fenced or whether it would just be the space for the chickens to prevent them from leaving <br />the area. <br />Commissioner Buesing stated that it would interpret that as fencing an area for the chickens, <br />although someone could fence their yard if they wanted. <br />Commissioner Thorson acknowledged the discussion from the previous meeting where they did <br />not want to mandate fencing of an entire yard because some people have double lots. <br />Chair Johnson suggested adding the word optional before exercise yard to provide additional <br />clarity. <br />Commissioner Boe-Schmidt suggested moving the language related to an exercise yard to a <br />lower section. She commented that if someone wants to allow their chickens to roam in their <br />yard, knowing the risks, perhaps that should be allowed. She noted that people that have dogs <br />are not forced to have a fenced yard. <br />Commissioner Carlson-Clark commented that chickens are less trainable and tend to wander, <br />defecate in other yards, and eat vegetation from neighboring yards therefore they require some <br />type of containment.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.