Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> MINUTC-S <br /> City Council <br /> June 11, 1980 <br /> Mr. Fahey introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br /> RESOLUTION N0. 80-6-198 - CLOSING THE PUBLIC HEARING <br /> ON THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT OF JACKSON STREET FROM <br /> LaBORE ROAD TO THE NORTH END BY SANITARY SEWER, <br /> WATERMAIN AND STREET IMPROVEMENT <br /> The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Mrs. Scalze. <br /> Ayes (4) Fahey, Scalze, Hanson, Nadeau. <br /> Nayes (0 <br /> Resolution declared adopted. <br /> This resolution appears in Resolution Book No. 6, Page 128. <br /> Mr. Fahey introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br /> RESOLUTION N0. 80-6-199 - DELETING THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT <br /> OF JACKSON STREET FROM LaBORE ROAD TO THE NORTH END BY <br /> SANITARY SEWER, WATERMAIN, AND STREET IMPROVEMENT <br /> The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Mrs. Scalze. <br /> Ayes (4) Fahey, Scalze, Hanson, Nadeau. <br /> Nayes (0). <br /> Resolution declared adopted. <br /> This resolution appears in Resolution Book No. 6, Page 128. <br /> Scully Mr. John Scully appeared before the Council requesting approval of a <br /> Property property division. Mr. Scully also informed the Council that the City <br /> Division Planner has done a report on the property division. Scully stated <br /> that before the report was done, the Planner was to have met with Mr. <br /> Scully. The Planner never did this. Mr. Scully also informed the <br /> Council that he has a bill from the Planner for over $100 for this <br /> report. <br /> The City Engineer stated that he saw no problem with the property <br /> division as long as there was an opening left for the possibility <br /> of a road. Mr. Scully stated that 60 feet has been left fora road. <br /> Councilman Fahey informed the Council that the Planner has suggested <br /> that this property division be studied in terms of the potential <br /> development of the entire area. Fahey stated that the Council should <br /> be thinking of the future development possibilities of this property. <br /> Councilman Nadeau stated that Mr. Scully should dedicate a 60 foot <br /> road right now. <br /> Councilman Fahey suggested that the Watershed District take a look <br /> at this property division. <br /> Mr. Fahey introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br /> RESOLUTION N0. 80-6-200 - APPROVING THE SCULLY PROPERTY <br /> DIVISION AS SUBMITTED BY MR. SCULLY WITH THE CONDITION <br /> .THAT THE APPROVAL IS SUBJECT TO APPROVAL OF THE WATERSHED <br /> DISTRICT AND THAT MR. SCULLY DEDICATE TO TFIE CITY A 60 FOOT <br /> ROAD EASEMENT EXTENDING TO THE NORTH 271 FEET TO Tf•IE PROPOSED <br /> NORTH LINE OF THE SUBDIVISION DIRECTLY WEST OF THE PROPOSED LOT A <br /> Paaa -2- <br /> <br />