Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> l~xlx~ ii Ll~ <br /> Ca:ty Cotmcsl <br /> xlugust 139 19ti0 <br /> t~lr. I~'ahey irrtrodrtced 'the fol:Lowing resolution ^nd moved itn adoptions <br /> ;LSOLU`.C:I:GiV iti0. 80mFY-295 <br /> !s tf:2LAU0i,~UT/I~GIV t.'t'liOV.t(Lil(J~~G /1'I(I~S rt11D-POrI\ i'VE1('.1CAYUC;S 1.~'OIZ 'SII; <br /> LOG1111O1v Ok kl iJIUAV .L~ViI UOPHLn LLLG`AROIv1G;; <br /> 'Ph:^ i'oregoing resolution t~ras duly seconded by iir. I;c;:~iace. <br /> rjc~~ (5) ~P'ahey9 Der3a.ce9 i3anson9 Scalze9 1Vadea.u. <br /> 1Vay~BS (O). <br /> Iierolut.'.i.on declared adopted. <br /> This resolution zppea.rs in Resolution ESOOk P1o. 69 Psp,e 190. <br /> Senior 'lkte City Planner s~bated that he rnet with .Mx~. Schrrier reea,rding the <br /> Citizen development of the achrier property on County kwad C, i~ir> Nielson9 <br /> ilousirrg 'the Planner' stated that under present City Code 'the Schrier property <br /> could he developed with. a raaximcan densaty of 1.35 units. l~tr. Schrier <br /> feels that he can develop the property tritYt a density of 155 units. <br /> Tyre P1z,srner stated that r1r. achrier is using the City Code in effect <br /> prior to the rnora'toxiuxn going into effect. <br /> A~Ir. 14ielson stated that i~Ir. Schrier is very firm on this 155 figure <br /> and will not snake a cornpxomise oh it. YVir. Schrier feels that he <br /> has approval for the :LG~`~ tutits as 'there is a c^~rr't order which. states <br /> that the City roust consider the request for the development of 'the <br /> property that he submitted to the Cotixrcil ;.>:ri.Ur 'C-, i;1ze ,uor~ato:riwn <br /> going into e:F.1'ect. i°ir< i~iielson stated that it Baas his opinioa'A that <br /> Schrier did not knave approval f'or 155 units, but that Dlr. Schrier <br /> feels he has this approval, <br /> .~rr, k<iielson further .-infoxtner? t1~e ^.ouncil that unless k-Ir. achriex <br /> gets the approval for the 155 uxrits9 hs will not sell ~t:ne property <br /> the Oi:ty is interested in for the senior citizen develo_prnent. <br /> Councilpersorrs aca.l.ze and t~'ahey felt 'the Oity should look elsewhere <br /> for property i'ox the sen:i.or c_i.tizen development. Fahey stated that <br /> its iaas not in favor of giving :[4r. Schrier approval for the 155 units. <br /> ~Ir. Nielson stated that he was not sure I~1'r. Schrier could get approval <br /> ttr 155 units under fire Cityrs old ordixra:nce. <br /> !attorney Parks stated that the court order Mr. Schrier has implied <br /> that he had approval f'or the 155 units. Parks further i.xrS'ormed Council <br /> that iir. Schrier.rs original proposal was denied oxr~the basis of the <br /> City s vrater situation at that time, Parlcs felt Schrier migkrt be <br /> assuming tkrat 'the City approved of everything else about the proposal, <br /> However9 this is incorrect, Parits also stated that k~ir. Schri.ex is <br /> now subject 'to the City~s present code, <br /> i4ayor Hanson stated that no further action on this subjecb *~rould be <br /> taiced at ~bkris brae. <br /> Page -10- <br /> <br />