Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />City Council <br />March 11, 1981 <br />Mrs. Sca7ze stated that she had some concerns with the ordinance. She <br />wanted the ordinance to prohibit the taking by any means in Little <br />Canada, including hunting, bow and arrow. This is why Mrs. Scalze <br />had recommended that the Vadnais Neights ordinance be fol7owed. <br />Scalze felt there were too many exceptions in this ordinance, and also <br />that there should be a provision in the ordinance that live traps <br />should be checked every so many hours. <br />Parks stated that the only people using live traps would be employees <br />o•F government agencies or units, and that these peop1e wou7d attend the <br />traps regularly. Private individuals are proh9bitedfrom live trapping. <br />Sca1ze also expressed concern wi•th Section C of the ordinance. Attorney <br />Parks stated that the ordinance must have some provision for a person to <br />get rid of a rat or a mouse or squirrel that was a nuisance. <br />Mrs, Scalze stated that under Vadnais Heights' ordinance there are no <br />exceptions and anyone asking for an exception must take it up with the <br />DNR. <br />Attorney Parks suggested that the Council look over the ordinance and <br />come back with any recommendations they might have. <br />St. Jude's Flttorney Parks reported that he met with St. Jude's regarding their park <br />Park Charge charge. St. Jude's agreed to a~10,000 park charge with $7,500 payab7e <br />on or before the date they get their occupancy permit for Phase I and <br />the remaining $2,500 payable when their plans are approved for Phase III, <br />or no 1ater than July 15, 1985. <br />Parks stated that St. Jude's has looked at what some other developments <br />in Little Canada have paid for park charges. Gopher Electronics paid <br />$1,200. St. Jude's also commented that they are le~ving 40% of their <br />property undeveloped. They have about $400,000 invested in just green <br />area. <br />Councilman Fahey asked if the City is going to require that this green <br />area be 7eft undeveloped as part of the PUD Agreement. Flttorney Parks <br />replied that it would. <br />Attorney Parks stated that he did not think St. Jude's would offer more <br />in the way of a park charge. <br />P4rs. Scalze stated that when the Park Commission recommended the $16,000 <br />park charge, they took into consideration the 40% green area. Sca7ze <br />questioned why the City is ending up with St. Jude's figure. <br />Mr. Forsberg asked if the City had discussion about public trai7s through <br />the St. Jude's property. Mayor Hanson rep1ied that St. Jude's was concerned <br />about insurance liability for such trails. <br />Attorney Parks stated that St. Jude's is planning their own private trail <br />system. <br />Page -17- <br />