Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />C9ty Council <br />March 17, 1981 <br />Mrs. Cus~ck ind~cated that she had no problem with the Planner's <br />suggestion. <br />The Planner also suggested that a performance bond be obtained to ensure <br />that the garage be removed. <br />Mayor Hanson indicated to Mrs. Cusick that she should come back with a <br />certified drawing of the proposed property division. Council will take <br />action on the property division at the time it received the certified <br />drawing. <br />The P7anner asked if on a simple property divis9on the City should require <br />drainage and utility easements. 7he Engineer stated that in some cases <br />it shoulcl, but there was no reason to do so in this case. <br />Guzik 7he Mayor 9ndicated that the City Flttorney had now arrived at the Council <br />Water meeting, and without objection the matter would be removed from table. <br />Hool<-Up <br />Request Mayor Flanson informed the City Attorney of what had previously transpired <br />at the meeting regarding the Guzik water hook up request. <br />Regarding Attorney Regnier's comments regarding the court case invo1ving <br />the City of Arden Hills, Attorney Parks stated that the courts would not <br />consider the first action of the City Council as a mistake. The courts <br />would feel that actions of the City Council should be applied uniform7y. <br />The City would have to show that to a11ow Purther water hook ups on <br />Little Ca.nada Road from properties fronting on Schletty Drive would be <br />detrimenta7 to the City. Mr. Parks stated that the Cuzik's could be <br />allowed to hook up if no one e1se wou1d have to pay a greater cost by <br />this being allowed. <br />Mayor Hanson reminded the Council that Mr. Germain had requested the City <br />to reimburse him for his well as he had to instal7 one when he was not <br />a7lowed to hook up 'to water on Little Canada Road. <br />The City Clerk s~ated that Germain took out his building permit on June <br />7, 1979 and water was not ready unti1 the Fall of 1979. <br />7he Flttorney stated that the cost of Cermain's well has nothing to clo <br />with the issue before the Council. <br />Mrs. Scalze pointed out ~hat the Warhall's did not pay anything to hook <br />up to City water. Scalze felt this was not fair to the rest of the people <br />paying a front footage charge. Sca7ze suggested that the City hold a <br />hearing and assess those hooking up on Little Canada Road from Schletty <br />Woods and put the money in escrow. <br />Flttorney Parks stated that this was the only way to handle the assessment <br />part ofi the issue. Parks felt there would be no cause for complaint if <br />money was set aside for watermain improvement on Sch1etty Drive from the <br />Guzik's. Parks a1so 9ndicated that the City wou1d have to assess Warhall <br />at the time the rest of the property owners in Schletty Woods would be <br />assessed for water on Schletty Drive. <br />Page -5- <br />