My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-09-81 Council Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1981
>
09-09-81 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/27/2014 2:13:12 PM
Creation date
7/31/2009 2:48:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i~[ LAJO1'LS <br />Ci by Councz.l <br />September 9s 19t3L <br />i~Lr, I~'~hey £elt that Paric Street should not be ~ut througli unaess it <br />goes all. the c•ray ihrough. I~'ahey s'ta'ced that i:f :~ark ~~~~et does not <br />~o throu~;h9 ttxat is the way :it :is,, but the Ci.ty shoulct hold on to the <br />easements it presently has, <br />Mrs. ivardani asked if the City could take the ~lnderson pro~orty, `~'ne <br />Attoxney reAolied that it could9 bub tne City 4rould end up ~~aying for <br />it, Sf;s•. paxks i.nforrned tkie Council that he has told the othe.r peop:Le <br />irzvo].'ved that the City would xzot be payin~ ior any easen~ents. <br />i~irs. Nardini statf;d tizaL she Uras ziot in favor of Pax~ic Sl;reec going <br />anywYiere but all the way through, Idardini also ~elt that if the City <br />condernned the Anderson pxoperty it could cost more than `V11~9000, <br />'1'he Attorney sug~;ested that the City cou:Ld either scra~ the pxoject <br />until all the oymers cooperate' or put tYie x~oad in up to the Andexson <br />properby and advise tir, tlndexsoxz that t,tkzen he decades to Coo~>e.ra.te9 tlae <br />City vrill contiszue the road through to S)emont. <br />i~ir, Paxks alsv sLated that he did not tkiink the City could ho~.d on to <br />the easements it has already ob'tained if the road did not go in, <br />P~Ir. Yarks thought that condemnation proceedings could cost the City <br />about :~49rjOOg and the C~ity would not be sure what the awaxd could be, <br />itr. Yarks also stated that if the City condemned the tlnderson property, <br />it should condenu~ a11 the properties involved in order bo treat everyone <br />uniformly, <br />i~ir. Car].ey stated that :if txie City does not have a contract returned <br />from Glen Coratracting within 30 days~ a.t has no contract, 'Phe Ci'ty <br />Cleric stated that the Ci ty ~~rould ther~ award the contract to 'the next <br />lowest bidder. If that bidder refused the project9 the project would <br />kiave to be rebid, <br />i~1r. I'ahey sug~ested that the rnatter be tablec3 for two vreeks to ~;zve the <br />~'ttorney an op~ortunity to go bac~ and txy to negotiate an easement <br />with i~lr, Anderson informing him that the project could be scraped. <br />The City Clerk asked if' the City would Ue able to cash the bid borzd <br />submitted by G1en Contract:Lng and collect 5jo. The I:raganeer believed <br />that tYAe C:ity could do this if the contract ended up to be null and void, <br />Nlr. Fa.hey suggested that perhap, Yark S'treet could be dipped into <br />the property opposite the Andersori property and thus avoid the need <br />for an easement from iQr, tlnderson. iir, F~ridersoza tiaould still be assessed <br />For the improvement, <br />Jerzny N[r. Yarks reported that Mrs, Costa+s attorn~y has not responded to him, <br />Gosta Bi1.7. Stengex has orde.red the k~lacktop berm that i•ras requested> F4r, <br />iJatter k'ax~lcs suggesi;ed that the Council would have sorne inforraation on tkzis <br />rnatter Urithin the next week or tvro, <br />1'age --~3- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.