02-24-82 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES City Council February 24, 1982 Viking Mr. Newman requested concept approval of the MGM portion of the Partnershi.p development. Proposal (Cont.) rlr. Fahey commented that he felt that t he traffic light in the area is an extension of the road system and the City does assess for the costs oE roads. Mr. Newman stated that if Viking Partnership can be legally assessed for the traffic Light, he wi11 agree to the assessment. The Planner commented that he did not understand the reason for givin~ concept approval in phases on this development. The Planner suggested the Council give concept approval on the whole development. Mr. Forsberg introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION N0. 82-2-98 - CLOSING TFIE YUBLIC HEARING ON TIiE VIKING PARTNERSHIP VARIANCE REQUESTS The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Mrs. Scalze. Ayes (4) Forsberg, Scalze, Hanson, Fahey. Nayes (0). Resolution declared adopted. This resolution appears in Resolution Book No. 8, Page 59. Mr. Fahey introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLU`PION N0. 82-2-99 - GRANTING CONCEPT APPROVAL OF THE VIKING PARTNERSEIIP PROPOSAL FOR LOTS 369 49~ 50~ and 51 AND PAFtTS OF LOTS 1, 2, 3, AND 4 OF TFIE J. F, EISENMENGER'S GARDEN LOTS ADDITION AS PRESENTED SUBJECT TO APPROVAL OF THE PRELIMI~ARY PLAT AND SATISFACTORY RESOLUTION OF ANY OTEtER QUESTIONS CONCERNING BUILDING PLANS AND THE PARK LAND DEDICATION FEE The foregoing resoLution was duly seconded by Mr. tlanson. Ayes (4) Fahey, Hanson, Forsberg, Scalze. Nayes (0). Resolution declared adopted, This resolution appeaxs in Resolution IIook No. 8, Page 60. Mrs. Scalze informed Mr, Newman that the Park Commission has recommended 10% of the £air market value of the property be collected for park charges in lieu of land. Mr. Newman suggested that perhaps Mr. Margolis could donate materials to the City for a portion of the park charges. birs. Scalze informed Mr. Newman that the City presently has no park land and she doubted that the Pazk Commission would accept materials. D7rs. Scalze commented that an appraisal is currently being done of Che property. The City Clerk thought that the appraisal may be ready by I~'riday. The City Clerk asked about the possibility o£ the second phase of the development not coming about or if a change is made in that phase~ would the developer have to come back to the Council. Page -9-