06-23-82 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

^9I~UTES C~ii:y Council. June 7_3, 19£12 Minnesota Tqr. ~larche, a resident of the area involved, aslced what Kr.. l~lubbard Mi.ni-SCOrage planned to do ~oi.th a].ow area where he proposed a roadway. Mr. (ConC.) Hubbard repLied thaC ther e is a sY.orm sewer at the con~er and the water wi11 flow into the pondi.ng area. There ca:ill also be catch basi.ns set at the lowest elevation of the Marche p roperty so that there cail.l be no pondi.n;; on thi.s proper.ty. C4r. Marche asl.<ed iL water and sewer wi11 be goinp, through. Mr. Flubbard r.epl.ied that i.t wi11 and that Minnesota ,`4i.ni-Storage ~vi.il be pay:i.n~; the assessments f.or th~i.s. ~ire Marchc asl<ed it f.enci.ng was pl.anned. Mr. tluUbard repli.ed that it is planned and indi.cltr-,d where the £encing crill be locateci. Mr. Hubbard reported that bui.ldi.ngs 9 and 10,on the plan ar.e not bei.ng proposecl £or this ti.me. Mrs. Nardtini aslced if Minnesota Mini.-Storage paid :i.ts applicati.on fee. The Planner repli.ed that t:hey had. A resi.dent of the ar.ea i.nformed Mr. }tubbard that. she was promised a privacy fence along the bacl< of her property. Mr. llubbard replied that he was not aware o£ thi.s, but thought that boards could be mounted on the chain l:inlc fence proposect. Mr. Pahey stated T.hat: he did not thi.nk it was unreasonable for the resident to r.equest a pr~.ivacy Lence. ~ Mrs. Nardi.n~i aslced if a detailed landscaping plan has been submi.tted. The PLanner repli.ed that he has submi.tted a report dateclPlarch 27 on this project. 7'his report poi.nts out major i.tems to be incltaded in Che development agreement. The Planner commented that some of: the :items still needed are a detail.ed I.andscapi.ng plan with a bid, a signlge pLan, building constructi.on drawi.ngs, pLus a record o£ I.and divi.sions and combinati.ons. The Planner stated that as Ear as he is awar.e the Ci.ty Pngineer and the State ar.e worki.ng on the gradi.ng of. the ponding area and T.his wi11 incl.ude the entire project. The grad:ing plan will be i.ncorpor.ated i.nto the legal documents. The Pianner r.eported tliat the concept is the same as originally submitted except for the elimination oL buiLdin,n,s 9 and 10, D1rs. Scalze reported that on Apri.1 £3, 19H1 the Counci.l. directed the City Attorney to wortc on the development a~;reement. At thi.s hi.me P4r. ilubbar.d stated thar he hoped Che C:ity would consi.cler the land he i.s gi.vi.ng to the State for pondi.ng as hi.s par.(c charge. Mr. tlubbard commented that he still does not thi.ntc ~.t i.s justified ~o require a pari< charf;e f.r.om hi.m in view of thi.s. Pap,e -10-