Laserfiche WebLink
MINt77'FS <br />Ci.ty Counci.l <br />June 23, 19£32 <br />Met:al-tronics Mr. Forsberg commenCed that Mr. Lee has talcen out a great deal oL <br />(Cont.) di_r.t on his property and t=1~i.s is encroaching onCO the Bucfc I~laclctop <br />property. <br />Mr. Lee reportect thaC he could not get the deeds in questi.on from <br />i<line until Mr. iCroiss satisfi.ed by payment to tC11.ne. That has been <br />done and Y.he deeds are now complete and wi.ll. be Co I3uc1< l~laclctop by <br />~tonday. <br />Mr. I~'orsberg astced whaT. Mr. Lee's plans are f.or the gradi.ng. Forsber~; <br />commented that the fill shou7.d not have been removed f:rom the propert:y <br />and the property should have been sl.oped. Porsberg stated Chat he <br />wants to see a plan for the embanlcment. <br />Mr. Lee state<i thnt he cam~ot f;et a Fi_ni_shed grading plan unF.il. <br />he <levelops the si.te. Then, Che si.te plan must be approved by the <br />Ci.ty Planner. <br />Mr. Pahey suggested that the Council. malce it a condition of. any appr.oval <br />that this be done. <br />Mr. Lee expressed surpri,e at Hr. Porsber~'s concerns, and infor.med <br />the Council thaT, he has heare! noChing contrary Lrom I3uck BlaclcCOp. <br />Mr, Lee again commented that he cannot ~aor.lc out a~;r.adi.ng pl.an until. <br />Che development pl.ans are finalz.zed. <br />Kr. Porsber~; stated Chat Mr. Lee has a beauti.ful. projecL, buC he wants <br />to make sure of. what is happening to that si.te. Porsberg stated that <br />Che embankment i.s washi.ng out. <br />Mr. Lee stated that he ~v:ill work with the P1.<^,nner on this. <br />Mrs. Scalze stated that she thinlcs PRr.. Lee has done a good job in the <br />past and wi11 come in with something on this. Mrs. Scalze asl<ed if. i.t <br />were right for tl~e Council. to consider bonds on ~ deveLopment bef:ore <br />the Counci.l. has had an opportunity to review buildi.ng plans. <br />The City ACtorney replie<i that_ the pr.elimi.nary resoluti.on says the <br />Counci.l's intent i.s to issue industri.al revenue bonds or whatever and <br />that the actual i.ssuance talces place a].on~ Cime down the r.oad. <br />The C~i.t:y ALtorney stated that he did not thinlc ~i.t necessary to see <br />building pl.ans at the adopti.on o£ the prelimi.nary resolul-ion. 'Lhis <br />does not mean Chat the Counci.l. must gi.ve f.i.nal approval. <br />T4rs. Scalze introduced the foll.owi.ng resoluCion and movect its adopt:ion: <br />R~SOLUTION N0. 42-6-331 -CAI.LING POlt A PIJBLIC <br />IIFARING ON A PROPOSAL i'OR AN INDUSTRIAL TACILI'CIIiS <br />DT3VELOPPI~NT PROJECT PIJRSUANT TO TI~II: MINNESOTA <br />~tUNICIPAL INDIJS'CRIAI.~ DF.VPLOPMPNT ACT AUTFIOI3I'J,ING <br />.Pllr plJJ3Li.GATI0D7 OP A NOT.ICT OF SAIll NGARING <br />I>age -13- <br />