06-23-82 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINU7'l:S Ci.ty Counc~i.l June 23, 1.982 Vilci.nP Mr. N:Lelson suggested that the ~ttorney r.evi.ew the plat pr~i_or to i.t Partnershi_p bei.n~; recordeci. (Cont.) Mrs. Scalze asked i£ the partc charge would be paid at the t:ime th~t the permi.t is issued. The C].erk repLLed that :i.t would. Mrs. Scalze introduced the Lollow:ing resoluti.on and moved i.ts adopCione RESOLIJ7'ION N0. II2-6-334 - APPROVTNG TEIP P'INAI~ PLAT T'OR VIi.CING PAF2TNL;RSHIP SUFiJ7'C7' TO 'CAE ,I2PVIEtd OF THG Tt']'Lli BY THE CITY A'L"CORNEY The foregoin~; resolut:i.on was duly seconded by Mrs. Nard:ini. Ayes (5) Sca].ze, Nardi_ni., Hanson, Porsberg, F'~hey. Nayes (0). i2esoluti.on declared aciopted. Thi> resol.utiori appears i.n J2esoluti.on floolc No. 8, Page 285. ieni_or 'I'he Ci.ty ACtor.ney pr.esenT.ed to the Counci.l. a copy oE Che opt:i.on Ci.ti.zen agreement and correspondence regar.di.ng the sen:ior c:it:izen hou,ing ltou,i.ng si.te and a copy of the proposed resol.uti.on relating to control of: the site by Lhe Ci.ty. 1'he Attorney reporeed that there is a Agenda pr.oblem w:it:h HIID. EIUD would lilce evidence of si.le control by Item No. 11 Che Ci.ty. The At~orney has prepared a resoluC:ion for adopti.on by the Counci.l whi.ch commi.ts the Ci.ty to the concept of. constr.uction and comm:i.tt~i.ng the Ci.ty to the property. 'Phe resoluti.on also ~;rants to the Little Canada Llderly and ltand:icapped Housing, Inc. that the City wil.l sell the property to them for '~40,000. Ilt7A wi.11. need this reso].ution so that the City'> appli.cati.on can be submi.Cted Uy June 30. LJithout the r.esolution HiJD wi11 not consi.der the,Ci.ty's ap~li.cati.on. 'Phe City At[orney also poi.nted out thaC the City wi_l.l. be agreei.no to purchase the properCy Lor $1~F0,000. Up to $40,000 of land costs can be :i.ncLudect in the mortgage, therefore, thexei.s $1.00,000 to compleCe the acquisiti.on of t:lle pr.operty. The Attorney inf.ormed Ck~e Counc:i.l Chat the Ci.ty i.s d:i.scuss:ing the possibili.ty of: a ~rade wi.th the property owner of. tlie Twi.n L,a)<r t31vd. ~roperty< If the trade ;_s coorked out, the Ci.ty cai.ll have no out-ot- pocket expenses. If not, Che Ci.ty wi11 have to come up wi.th ~y100,000. The AtCOrney also commented thaC i.L the Land costs are $0, the Ci.ty appl.:icati.on has a better chance f.or approval. r4r. T'ahey commente<t that, i.E the Council is sCicici.ng :its neclcs out for $100,000, why not do i.t f.or $140,000. Mr. Porsber.g aslced how the $140,000 f:i.gure caas a.r:i.vec; at, The Attorney reportect that that i.s the aslci.ng pri.ce of the property and tl~ere is no room for. negotiation. Yage -16-