My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-23-82 Council Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1982
>
06-23-82 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/27/2014 2:17:10 PM
Creation date
7/31/2009 2:49:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINVC[ilS <br />City Coi.mci_1 <br />June 23, 1982. <br />I{L1Si11CIC <br />MatCer <br />(Cont.) <br />N[r.. Porsberg reported that Mr.. ilusn:i.clc's complai.nt i.s wit1~ tkte s:ice <br />of.' the cul.vext.. 1~1e cloes not Eeel he should pay the cost of.~ addi.ng to iC <br />because the culvert is oversi.zed and serves such a 1ar.ge ar.ea. <br />Mrs. Scal.ze commenteci that P1r. }lusni.clc should reali.ze that hi.s trai.ler. <br />parlc would not even 6e there i.f not for the culverC. <br />rorsberp, sT.ated that i.t :i.sn't }tusni.clc's problem that [he culvert i.s <br />so bi.g. <br />i'ahey su~;{;ested that the Council send hi.m a letter and i.f Chey do <br />not hear by the July 1/4 mrecing, the City should c~.~11 for a piabl.ic <br />hc2rin~;. <br />Mrs. Nardini_ commented Chat the matCer has been f;oing on f.or a year. <br />The tingirieer suggested that the C:ity ~ive ]-lusnick 30 deys. <br />Mr.. Sweeney commented that he will. write Co llusni.dc giving 1~1.m 30 days <br />or else the Ci.ty wi_11 call. Lor a publ:i.c heari.ng to consicter the <br />impr.ovement and a,sessi.np, the cost. ~ <br />Ordinance 'Che Ci.ty CLerlc i.ntormed the Council Chat he can fi.nd no ref:er.ence t:o <br />No. 65 Ordi.nance No. 65 i.n the C~ity's Code. 7'he C1er.lc statecl that he <br />thinlcs the Counc:i.l. should reaciopt the or.dinance and give it-, a new <br />Agenda number. T}te Clerk questioned whether. or not the ordi.nance was i.n <br />Item No. 14 effect. <br />The City Attorney commented that the Ordi.nance is probabl.y a part <br />ot the City's appendi.x of the Code. 'Phe Attorney suggested that <br />the Counci.l. just indi.cate that Che Ordi.nance is a parC of the appendix. <br />?1r. Pahey :introctuced [he Lollpwing resolut:i.on and moved its adoption: <br />RESOI.,UTION N0. 82-6-337 - RECLARIPYI~G ORIYINANCE <br />D70, 65 AS ORIGINALLY ADOPTPD IN TtIE AP,PENDIX OP' <br />THP CITY CODIi <br />'The f.oregoing resoluti.on caas duLy seconcled by Mr. Ilanson. <br />Ayes (5) Fahey, 1~Ianson, 7?orsbera, Scal.ze, Nardini.. <br />Nayes (0). <br />Resoluti.on declared adopted. <br />Thi.s resoluti.on appear.s i.n Ttesolution Boolc No. 8, Page 2£3£3, <br />Countr.y 'Che Ci.ty Engineer reported that Che City has received the follow~ing <br />Dri.ve Imp. bids for the State aid worl< on Country Drive: <br />lagenda <br />I[em No. ].5 Page -19- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.