Laserfiche WebLink
AIINUT'L:S <br />Ci.ty Counci.l <br />June 23, 198?_ <br />ISroi.ss rTr. Pahey commented that he cti.d not feel i.t unreasonabLe for Che <br />I?1<~t (Cont.) Counci_1 to require that a pl.at conform Co Che natural boundaries <br />o£ Che area. Pahey stated that he ~vould not be in favor oL the <br />plat unless I.ots 7_ and 3 evere combined. Fahey stateci that he d:i.cl <br />not thi.nlc the Counci.l should cut up ex:isting nei.ghborhoods Lhat <br />drast:ically. <br />The Ci.ty Cl.erlc commentecl that Ramsey Cotmty may requi.r.e ad<li.tional <br />ri.ght-of-way in [his area as they have requested that I:,d~erton <br />SCreet have a 99 foot right-of-way. If this happened, there is a <br />poss~ibi.lity th1C Lot 7_ coould not have enough square footage. <br />r1r. I'ahey asi<ed if the Council recruested thaC Mr. Kroiss devel.op <br />the property as a PUD wi.th Lots 2 and 3 comUined, i.f a vari.ance <br />would be necessary for Lot 4. <br />Mayor tianson aslced ~v.hat the acreage requi.rement *,vas for a PiJD. The <br />Planner repl.i.ed that there_ was none. <br />Pahey commented that the Counc:i.1 should improve Che intregrity oE a <br />nei~;hUorhood cohere it can. i'ahey commented that the Council should <br />not destroy the natural boundari.es of the pro~erty. <br />Mr. Forsberg i.ntroduced the f:ollowing resol.ut.i.on and moved its adopti.on: <br />RESOLUTION N0. 82-6-323 - CI~OSSNG THG Pl)AL7C <br />Pll:ARING ON 'CHP KROISS PRPLiMTNARY PLt1T AND <br />VARIANCE RF3QUES'P <br />The foregoi.ng resoluti.on was duly seconded by Mr. Hanson. <br />Ayes (5) Forsberp„ Itanson, Pahey, Nardi.ni, Scal.re. <br />~ayes (0). <br />itesoLution declared adopted. <br />Th:is resolut~.ion appears in Resoluti.on }3oolc No. 8, Page ?_73. <br />Mr.. Kroi.ss infor.med the Council [hat he cvotil.d rather make the necessary <br />chanp,es in Lot 4 and i.ncrease the si.ze of I.ot 2 than combine Lots 2 <br />and 3. <br />Rahey commented that lie feels LoC 7_ :i.s destroy:ing the natural boundary <br />of the pr.operty. <br />Mr. Porsbern stated that he was not concerned with I,ot 2 as long as <br />i.t met the 10,000 squlre f:oot requ~ir.ement. <br />Pahey pointed ou[ that the Ci.ty turned dotin the or:igi.nal Dianna I,ane <br />plat because o£ the impact i.t aould have on the ].alce, Pahey sCated <br />that he felt Lot:s 2 and 3 would have an i.mpacL on the area and shoulci <br />be combined. <br />Mr.. Forsberg poLnted out the :i.mpact that the small l.ots on Karl.a Lane <br />have on the area. <br />Page -6- <br />