Laserfiche WebLink
T~ITNU'I'PS <br />Ci.ty Co~mc:i.1 <br />Jul.y 14, 1982 <br />Se~ver And The f:ore~;oi.n; reso].uCion was dul.y seconded by `~Irs. Scalze. <br />S]ater Aye~s (5) \ard:i.ni., Scal.ze, Planson, Pahey, Forsberg. <br />Connection Nayes (0). <br />Ch~rges (Cont.) Resolut:ion decl.ared adopted, <br />7'hi.s resolution a~~pea~rs ~in Re,sol.ut:i.on :~look Tlo, 8, P1;e 306< <br />Varizince 'Chc Bui.ldLn~; Inspec[or i.nformed the Counc:il ChaC he feels a$250 <br />Proc~~.dures charge is too ti:i.;h to ch~rge someone for a vari.ance r~quest. <br />Ag;enda i4r.. Pahey sug~;e,ted that the Counci.l. couid have a$100 depo>i.t <br />Item No< 31?3 ~,~ith a$25 set f;ee and the bal.anc~ refundable, Fahey 11so >ugge.sted <br />that che Ci.Cy shoul<t u,e i.ts own records to detcrmi.ne pr.operty <br />owner,ship. <br />Fahey also su~;gested that tl~e 13uil.di.n~; Inspector review Che <br />vari.arice reqtiesi: in~tt~ial.7.y and consul.t Che ~'lae~ner i_E he neecls <br />i:o and then send t:h~ request to the Planning Commi.ss~ion. <br />rahey stated that now that.: i:he Ci.ty has a Ful1-ti.me liu~i.lda.ng <br />Tnspector he should be rev:i.ew:in~; vari.ance request:s, ~nd, hope(ully, <br />the charpes for these reqt.ies[s could t~e lcept down to $25. <br />i4rs< Nardini aslced i_,E tl~ie Ci.ty is l.egally requ:i.r.ed to determine <br />pro~erly ownership. <br />'LPie Pl.c~nner st~~ted that Stat:e Statute does not requ~irc thait z public <br />near:i.ng be held. The Attorney thought that t}ii.s G~as cor.rect:. <br />A hFar.i.ng is requ~ised for zon.-Ln„ amendmenCS, but otherwise :i.t 1s <br />up to thc C~ily to set tYie procedure ane9 ,fees charged for processing <br />the request. <br />Tl~e City Clerlc reporCed tl~~~tt the C'i.tq gets a].ist: of propert.y ownersk~ips <br />at the begi.nning o[ the year. <br />The Eiu:i.lcl~ing :CnspecCOx• stated that he fe1t. i.t ~v1s a burden on t:he <br />people to have Co obtai.n a certifi.ed li.sC. <br />NIr. Porsberg stated t:hat he felC tkie $100 fee wa5 discour.agtng to <br />peop7.e. I°orsberg comiuented thzit he dicl not want to ericourage var;i.ance <br />requesCS. <br />"1rs. \ardi.ni- sCatecl Cl1at she recal.l.ed Clayton Partcs saying that t~ <br />var~i.ance, was a special f:nin;. Nard~i.n~(. f:e1t ChaC the fees sl~iould <br />reflecC Chi.s. <br />P1hey stated that t11e City should noC mak~~~ it. so c(i.fficult that the <br />people w:i.11 noC malce t:he requesC. <br />1'he Pl.anner :informed the Counci.l. ChaC some c~Lties have m:inor vc~ir.ilnce, <br />~nd rnajor vari.ances. A minor har.dsh~ip mighC. be as tl~e result of a <br /><:~~aez~;e in an ordi.nance or puh>l.i.c usc and usually di.ct not exceed f.i.ve <br />feet. <br />Page -1f3- <br />