Laserfiche WebLink
r~~~r~uTt~s <br />CiCy Coi.mci.l. <br />Ju1y l4, 1982 <br />Johansen t°ir.s. Scal.-r.e commented thac she agreed. Scalze di.d not f.ee1 Che <br />Var_i.ance proper.ty sktoul.d be consi.dered a f:ront yard, Scal•r.e f:eiC tk~at the <br />(ConC<) maCter should be handlc~d i.n the shoreland ordi.nance. ScaJ.ze al.so <br />commented Chat peopl.e i.n the Ci.ty are not aware of what they need <br />a buildi.ng permiC ior. Scal.ze f:el.t Chae this s}ioulcl be aclclr.essFd <br />i.n an i.n,ert i.n sewer b:i.11.s> <br />Mr. Fahey commented Chat: the Counc~.i.1 indicated to the .Johansens' at <br />a prev?ous meet:in<~ that i.t ~vould be recept:i.ve Co a vari.ance, I~ahey <br />sCated that 1~c would p,o al.ong ~aiCh a variance, but. felt th~t. part o£ <br />the situat~ion would f11.1 ~inder the requ:irement.s for a var.i.ance whi.l.e <br />part <loes not as there is no har.dshi.pe <br />Mrs. Nar.dini. commented th~t she f.e1C the Counc~il i_s overl.oolcing the <br />.Eact: cl~at by granting the vari.ance it would be gr~nting a speci.al. use <br />to someone because they vi.eco a 7.a)ce. Narcl:i.n~i. aslced, how Che Counci.1. <br />woul<I handle the situaCi_on of someone noe on a Laice who would lilce <br />a screerihouse. Mrs. Nard:ini stated that the Council. should not <br />f;rant someChi.ng Co some peopl.e that. i.t ~aoulcl not Ue wi1l.i.ng to <br />~;r.ant to others. <br />Pahey commented that perhaps the City should handle the s:i.tuaCi.on tander <br />the sl~orel.and ordi.nance and ref:und the fees to the .7ohansens', <br />A1rs. .Johansen commenCecl that they are nayi_ng taxes on the property <br />and should be all.owed to mal<e use of it, <br />ilrs. Nardi.ni commented thaC Che or.d:i.nance speci.fi.cal.l.y ,tates that <br />someone cannot have an accessory buildi.ng ~i.n thei.r fronC yard. 'Che <br />Planner commented that the ordi.nance states Chai: an accessory bui.7.r.Ii.ng <br />:is not allowed in a reqiiised Lront ynrd. <br />Mr. PorsUerg comrnented thaC he felt that i:he Counc~i.l. was caast:i.ng a <br />lot of Ci.me on thi.s and felt the Johansens' shotilcl be granted a <br />vari.ance, <br />P1rs. Nard:ini statecl that i£ the ord~,inance is wrong ~iC shoul.d be <br />ch2n~;ed. <br />i1r. }{anson i.ntroduced the fotloo~in~ resoluti.on and moved i.ts adoption: <br />RESOI,U'CION N0. 82-7-343 - CLOSING 'CI~LP PUIILIC <br />tILARING ON 'CftE JOf1AN5PV VA}2IANC~ P~QU~ST <br />The fore~oing resoluti.on was dul.y seconcled by A1r.s. Scal.ze. <br />Ayes (5) l~l~anson, Scal.ze, T'orsberg, Alard~ini., Pehey. <br />Nayes (0). <br />3:esoluti.on declared adop[ecl. <br />'Chi.s resol.ution appears i.n Resolution Rooi< No. 8, Page 294, <br />Mr. Fahey stat~d that he woulcl be w:il.l.i.ng i.o refund C:he ,Johansens' <br />money ~nd handLe the matter in [he shorel.and ordtinanc~. <br />Yage -3- <br />