07-14-82 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

r~t~trrrs c~r.y c~un~;.i. July 14, 19f37_ R;~ S Land Mr. 7)ohr stated Chat i=hey are ~~.17.i.ng Co put the road ~.in and when Fil1 Permit the Gerval.s propertq is avai.lable, the road could be eatended (Cont,) doson Co South Owasso. ~1r. ror.sberg stated Y.hat the owner, oL the pr.oper.ty on the south are not interested .i.n a road. Mr. I~'aliey aslced Mr. Dohr i.f ne woulcl be wi.lli.ng to agree that if and *.ahen Che roacl~aas extended t:hey would upgracle the:ir ~ortton of the road. Mrs. Sca1zF commentecl Chat [hc qi.iest~i.on i.s if, Cher_e i.s enough r.oom for the road. The TngineE~r comment.ed thaC a retaining wal.l. mziy be needed ~round Che bu~i.ldinp,. Mr. For,berg sCated that: the builclin~ should no~ be ].ocaCecl where ~it is. Mr. Dohr repli.ed t:hat when the buildi.n~ aas bu;.lt no on~~ tl~iought about a road. T.4r. T'ahey stat:ed that i.f they want to puC ~i.n a pri.vate cir:i.veway, they should be al.l.owed to de?i.t. Pahey stated thxt they should be required Lo upgrade the road when Che ].ower property develops. Mrs. Nardini asiced how a pr~ivaCe dri.~zeway is def~i.ned. Pdar.cli.n:i asked ~i.f the clriveway woul.d be con,idered pci.vaCe or commercial. N(x~. ~I~lanson as1.<ed ~if the driveway cot.ild be ].ocated on the west o.f the property. Mr. Do1~r rep7.ied that that is wl~a[ they ori.,~~,inally wanted to do, but i.t was dctermi.ned that they could not do i.C. P1rs. Scalre stated that the road should go :i.n the 60 fooT. space. Sca].ze commenCed that from experi.ence the Council. Lcarned thztt they cannoC ~,et r.i roac.i easement: unless Chey p,eT. it when a proper.ty oraner is request.:i.ng someth:in~ e1sc. From the Coi.znci.l. ~7r.. Hanson suggested that the Bi.t~ildi.np, Inspector ].ool< at the property and t:he matter be broug;liC up again at the nex~ Council meetin;;. iQrs. Scal.ze stated tkiat the Counci.l shoul.d revi.ew tkie ~l.ans Che P7.anner previousl.y submitted for raacls i.n CI~e area. Mrs. Sealze asl,ced i.f tl~e City woold have any sort of ].iabi.lity on th;i.s coxner. The 7?nd:i.nFer repl:ied that the road_ would t~e tabeledas a orivate driveway. Mr, Ilanson sCated tl~iat w~ithoi.iC any accurate measurements, the Counci.1. was ~fust tal.lci.n~;. Mr.s. Scal.ze ,tnted that the Oity skiould deter.mine how ~o~i.cie the area is. The Enp,S.necr aoreecl Yhat he should tal.ce anoeher ].ool< at the area, Mr. Fahey aslc~d if. Che bui.ld;in~ coutd be moved, @9r. Dohr commented that :i.t could not. Page -7-