My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-08-82 Council Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1982
>
09-08-82 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/3/2009 1:43:33 PM
Creation date
7/31/2009 2:49:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
rzzNU•rLs <br />Ci.ty Council <br />Septembec 8, 19t32 <br />Greenbrier The Pngineer commenCed that these petiti.ons shoulci be in wi.thin <br />Circle Ckie next 10 days. <br />& Iona Lane <br />(Cont.) Mr, Glanzer r.eported that Sunri.se Drive and Schletty Drive have <br /> t:he curb and p,utter that may be peti.tionect for. <br />Delay I3y Mrs. NarcLi.ni aslced how rnuch money it ~aill cost Che people gett.ing <br />CiCy improvements this year i.n terms oE thei.r assessments as the C:i.ty <br />Contractor. coritractor will. not complete the job in ti.me for the Gity to <br />assess the projects chi.s year. <br />Non-Agenda <br />Item No. ?_ The Fngineer replied that it may cost additional money, Uut on the <br />other. hand, the contractor lias not been paid and the City has been <br />earning interest on the money held for paymenC to the contractor. <br />The Enf;ineer reported that the F~rojects wi.ll probaUly be assessed <br />1.n June of 1953. <br />The rngineer also commentecl that Mrs. Nardi.ni's question could not be <br />anscoered ~ai.thout discussing the situati.on wi.th !he City CLerlc and City <br />Auditor. <br />Thc Engineer stated that .if the City assessed the pr.ojects now <br />it may assess too much money or not enough money. <br />'Che t'sngineer also informed the Coimci.l that the <br />malce the compl.etion date for the pr.ojects. Mr. <br />that this is basically a watermai.n ~roject and <br />on a case where the jvdge rulecl that cohen water <br />the job is substantially complete. The sod may <br />the City would not be abl.e to hold Chat a~;ainst <br />contractor will sti.ll <br />Car.ley pointed out <br />1e has been in court <br />is in the system, <br />not be done, but <br />the contractor. <br />Mr.s. Nardini. aslced when peopl.e wi.lt be abLe to connect to water on <br />County Road 13-2. 'The Fn~ineer replied that the system will. be ready <br />£or connection in about two wee(cse <br />City Property Mrs. ScaLze aslced if too much Li11 was bei.ng put on Cl~e City lot <br />On Center- next to the Water Worlcs property on Centerville Road. Mrs. Scalze <br />ville was concerned that Che City wi.ll talce away from the l.ot's uses i.f <br /> i.t i s filled El.at. <br />Non-A~enda <br />Item No. 3 Mr. Glanzer. repli.ed that the l.ot was a hole and the fini.shed produc[ <br /> will be leve7. with the street. Mr. Gl.anzer also commented that a <br /> lot of the fill that is visi.ble right now will b e pushed baclc into <br /> the rear of the property, <br />t1r. Fahey aslced how wide Che property is. The Ci.ty Clerlc replied <br />that i.t is mor.e than 7.i feet. wi.de. <br />Page -11.- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.