Laserfiche WebLink
yzNU•rrs <br />CiCy Coimci_]. <br />September H, 1987. <br />Kloslcin Sign The E3uilcting Inspector commented that there should not Ue a sign in <br />(Cont.) any area where a vehi.cl.e cvould drive. <br />Mrs. Nardini introducect the followin~; resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION N0. 82-9-451 - TAI3LING ACTION ON <br />THE KLOSKIN SIGN R~QUEST AND REQU~STING THAT <br />THE BUILDING INSP~CTOR S~ND A COPY OT HIS <br />P.IiPORT 'PO MR. KLOSKIN AND MPET SdITH HIM ON A <br />P~RSONAL I3ASIS IF NGC~SSARY <br />The forep,oi.ng resolution was duly seconded by Mr. Hanson. <br />Ayes (5) Nardini, tlanson, Pahey, Forsberg~ Scalzea <br />Nayes (0). <br />Resolution declared adopted. <br />This resoluCion appears i.n Resolution Book No. 8, Page 397. <br />Request For Mr. }tanson asked the C~i.ty Attorney for a clarification of what the <br />Vacation Of. City is dealin~; with with regard to a thoroughf:are plan. <br />Proposed <br />Street }3eCween The Attorney replied that in a Choroughfare p1an, a proposed street <br />Edgerton And would be a part of t.he City's Comprehensive Plan. Itowever., it does <br />Vanderbi.e not indicaCe that the City has right-ot-way. <br />Agenda If. someone applied for a bui.lding permi_t on a lot through wh:ich <br />Item No. 8 there i.s a proposed street in the City's thoroughfare plan, the <br />City would have six months in which to buy the property proposed <br />for the street. <br />Mr. I[anson indicated to the Counci.l that ~he City has received a <br />petition for Che vacation ot hhe proposed street Located between <br />I?dgerton and Vanderbie. <br />Mr.s. Nardi.ni commented that she was not in favor of vacating Chis <br />street. Mr.s. Nardini indicated that Mrs. Neamy was given several <br />options Lor the development of her. property. <br />The City Clerl< indicated that a public hearing must be held before <br />the City Council can ac[ on the vacation request< <br />Mr. Porsberg i.ndicated that the lots on Edgerton would be the onLy <br />ones to benefi.t by the proposed streets. Mrs. Nardi.ni disagreed <br />and sCated that t(iere are lots on Vanderbie that coulci be split <br />shouid the street go in. <br />Krs. Scalze commented that she fe.1t the Council should hold a publ.ic <br />heari.n~ on the request and ~;ive the people an oppor.tunity to be hear.cl <br />on Che maT.ter. <br />Page -5- <br />