Laserfiche WebLink
tvtlNtrr}:~;s <br />Ci.ty Cottttc:i.l. <br />Sepc. 29, 1952 <br />~!mploy~e M~c, L'o~rsberg commented thaC Chat woul.d mean that i9x< Drake can <br />Salar,ies oiily coork 8 hours per we~(c for tl~ie RecreaCion 1~epartment:. <br />(Cont.) <br />Mr. itorelan commentcd that he 1~~1s ~informed N[r. 1)ral<e that he can <br />onl.y *aor'c 8 hours per. weel<. <br />1~):`33 t1r. Hanson poinced oiat th~it on page ].5 of t:he pro~~osed budget are <br />,Rud~et t:l~ie CiCy's ].9f33 est:Lmated revenues. <br />~1r. Fahey aslced i.f- the: buil<I~ing permi.C fees ~aere esti.matect 1ow. <br />N[r. Chlebecic repl:i.ed C1'iat they were. <br />Coimci.l. deci.cled that under the P9ayor Cotmcil port~ion of: the budp,eC: <br />[lccount No. 101.-9110-1.01. could be cut $F~00 t:o ~9,600 and <br />Accourit No. 107.-97.17.-101 could be cut ft3,100 to $10,900. The total <br />proposed bud~et Eor Account No. 101 t9ayor Council caas then ~`i7.,300. <br />Counci.l. determi.ned thaC these could be no cuts made in nccount: No, <br />7.0?_ Court CosC esti.mated at $1.6,200 and ;in Account ~Io. 103 ~=7.ections <br />estimated at !~3,336. <br />T.'he nc>,xt >ect:ion of Chc bud;et cons'~ider.ed was Account No. 104 <br />Office oi.` the Cler.k budgeted aC ¢36,?_62. Council. determi-ned that <br />no cuCS c.ould be mtide ~i.n Chi.> acco~mC. <br />The Clerlc reported ttiat the C:ity Planner !Zas i.nformed h,Lm th~t he <br />expecls a 1.9% decrease f.or 1953. Ho~oever, the CS.ty Clerl< ,i.s projec~ing <br />an increased amourit needed :i.n Account: Plo. ].06 Plann:i.n~;. 'C}ie cl.erlc <br />~is proposi.ng a buclget of $23,450. ~frs. Nardini. stated tYi~C she Lel.t <br />adjustments could 1>e made :i.n the projected Attorney and 1?ng~i.nE:et' fe~~~s. <br />The Clerl< commenCed thlt Che Attorney i_s doi.ng more thorouah p1<an <br />revi.ew, Ch~n the ~~revious CiCy AtCOr.ney. Counci7. cieCermi_ned that <br />no cues could be made in Chi.s area. <br />Cdr. Pal~ey suggest:ed tt~at the Citq can de].et.~ the posi.tion of. Ci.Cy <br />Tr.easurer and thus redtice the budneC by $2,000 by eliminati.ng <br />E#CCOULII: P~O. .I.OS< <br />'Che City Clerlr, reporCed Craat if [11e Counci.l. combines the of.f.ices of <br />City Clerk and 'Cr.easurer, t:he Ci.ty wi.l.l need an audit done each <br />year. flo~oever, Ctie C1er.lc poi.ntecl out thaC the Ci.ty alre~dy does [his. <br />N[r< 7?ah~y sug~esCed t.hat the Ci.ty have a pl.aque made recogni.zi.n~; <br />Mr. )3oss's years oE service as City Treasur.er. Mr. Hanson su~;~ested <br />thaC tl~~e C~i.Cy al.so do sornethin~ s:i.mi_'1ar. for Mr. Spooner.. Pahey <br />si.~gEested [h,~t: ~ p~icL:i.ir~ of each man be d~i.splayed ~i.n Che~ Ci.ty F1a11. <br />Mr. Pahey suggested that the Ci.Cy CLerk arrange a luncheon or dinner <br />for the>e Czoo gent:7.emen and also arrange for p'laques to present Co <br />them. <br />Pa~;e -1.6- <br />