10-13-82 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

'°f T .~:!i J9• I :;S City Counci7. Oct. 1.3, 19£37_ 1Croi.ss °,lat ~[rs. Scalze i_nform~;d f~4r. Do}>ney that the Sounc~i_t. clid no~ use as (ConC..) critr~~r{.a ~.Cn i.CS deci.s.i_on Co deny the o1.at thaC Clie nci_~ht>ors' Lost th~ir vi_e*a. 6calze stat.erl 111at tliLs was not a v~li_f.ar as she ~.aat> concc:~rn<-~c~. Scal.ze sLated that st~e was con,i.deri.rt;; thF s_i_te. Scalze also commented, that the C~i.ty i_s 1oo'd_n;; aC a~ lot it urill. have [o live wi.th Porever, A1rs. 3c il.ae a1;o read sor.ie statem~i~its from D1r. po6n~-~y's ].et:ter tq t.l~ie Ci_Cy or,~;i.ch Scilrc. sCated sh~ f.elt contained tl~ie threat of, a 1uc.sui.C. i~?r.~. Do'r~ney sCated that Che Ci.t~ ha, no v11id re~x:~;on for denyin; tl'ie p1at. Dobncy stated tlvat i_E tlie C,'i_ty wanes to channe ~i.ts cod~ ~i.t: should do so and appl.y it to everyone. Mr. Dobney sGat~.~l that ,~ir. ?Cro~igs ts noP roqi.i~,k.i.ng any varitmces ~nd has inc(ic~ited tl~tat he wi1.1 .>,i.ve an c~v,tra 1.0 feet: for t'~e ~.oi.deni.ng oC Cds;erP.on 'itreet. i°ir.'. Dobney staCed Chal he slloiil.cl not have to eonv:i.nce Che Counr„i7. t:hat T1r. ?<,ro~ss i, ri~ht, C1~iCi:-e shoi.ild 'i>e some compel.l~inn, reas~ri ahy they are wrc~nf;, htr. Pahey stated tk~at the sub<.i.v,is~ion ot-dinac~e :says tl~at a sul_~- ~l~iv~Csi.on must retace well. ca4.t1~ lhc c.;ei.st inf; ne~i;hhor.hood, Fahey scated th2t. the enCire charzcter of t}~e nei~hborhood orould be cl~ian~;ed by tlxe plat_. i4r. Dobne} sCaCc;cl that there are many o~hcr tots i.n Che area [h~t are small~~v- than tlie one> nropo,ed by •`~1r. ILroi,s. '~r. :~'lhcy repl.i.ed that 7.ot. 2 as pronosed l~~ :rtr. !',roi-ss i.s by far the smal.test 1ot in tJ1e enCise area, ~ir. Don i,aclcner aapeared bef.ore the Counci.l. A?r. Laclrner staCed that h~~ l.~iv<>s or~ a l.oc di.r~cC1y acroe~s f~rom G1~ie proposed LoC 2. rl~is l.ot. consi_sts of 4G.,~67 squaie i:cet. ~r. Laic!:ner st.itcd C.i~aT. he and C1ic ne:ioitbors 7iave pa~id tar,e> Co ~h.e C~it.y fot many many years. '~~r.. Laclrner al>o po:t.nted out fhat ~~(r. Gor.clon 1'orb~, who li.ves a<7;jacent to tl~~e propert.y :i.n qursCi.on, was t`ie e~ecutor of Cl.~e P~runson ~sCaf:e and he probably deci.ded [o sel.l. th~ property C.o ~=`[r. iG-oi.,s, ~-1r. Laclcn~r al.so comm~nted that when t:he ne,i.ghbor, ~re tall<i.n~ subouC tl~~e v~i.ew, t:hey were referrin? to the ,ize. of Cl.e area. P4r. t~orsnez~a i.nf_onned thE aud~i.ence Chat he 1iva, on ti l.~rge 10~ on f~,d„erCon sCreet ~and I~e co1, not i.n Favor oE Che less ~han )Z~:l.f acre pl.ats approvcd on Payne Aveni.ie. ~f,rfi. "ca7.ze po-.inted out that the Carslce p7.at was an ol.d plat. CSx~. John I,aclcner apneared 'oeEora chc Council.. :`~?r. Lackner stated P~hat ;~e 1.~ivES di.rectly ~cross from~ the properr_y Co the souCh. i~[r. Lackner state~l that he wms not even happy abouC ap~~~roval of C`tc pt.a~ w~.ieh Lots 2 and 3 combined. "dr~. Laclrne~- stat~d Ct'it~t he objected to the ,ul~div:i.s~i.on of <~ px~oper.ty after tlie ori.ginal propert.y h~s 6een bui.lt upori. Mr> L,aclcner sCated CI.-iat he objccC~d to the jerrymtaiideri_n„ uf propertq 7.i.nes, Lacl<nF.~r steited tkiat the Counc-~1 iias 1 r~~~sponsibili.try Co the Ci_ty that there bc~ orcle~rl.y devel.opmc.nt ehcrou~;hout. the CiCy< Pat,e -6-