My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-08-82 Council Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1982
>
12-08-82 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/3/2009 1:46:39 PM
Creation date
7/31/2009 2:49:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mi~~v~crs <br />Ci.ty Council. <br />Dec. 3, 1.9F3? <br />Bi.n;o (Cont.) Mr. Fahey stated thaC the cons:iderati_on t3rinlcman pai.d f:or hav:ing Che <br />proper.ty r.ezoned was that C}ter~~~ would be no bi.n~;o al.lowed. P4rs. <br />Scal.ze stated that the City Attorney ind~icated that it was legal to <br />do this. <br />Mr. ilanson sug~ested thaC the hours of operaCi.on be i.ncreased Co <br />four. <br />P1r. Pahey stated that he was agai.nst the ordinance as submitted <br />because he felt tl~at someone shoulct be r,1lo~aed Co have two or three <br />occasi.ons per year. ~ai.thout permi.C necessar.y. Mr. Ilanson staCed that <br />he agreed. <br />Mrs. Nardi.ni. i.ntroduced the iollowing or.di.nance and moved :i.ts adoption: <br />ORDINANCB ~10. 200 - AN ORDINANCE ADDIDIG <br />CItAP'CPR S13 'CO TF[E T4UNICIPt1L CODli OP' THIs <br />CI'.CY OI' I,I'f.Tl,l CANAI)A, RtiGULATING BINC;O <br />WITH TI1E C}IANGP UNDF..R SPC'I'ION 81.3.040 TO ~I'OUR I~IOtJR6 <br />The foregoing ordi.nance was duly seconded by Mr.s. Scal.ze. <br />Ayes (3) Nar.dini., Scalze, Forsberg. <br />Nayes (2) }tanson, liahey. <br />OrcLinance decl.ared adopi:ed. <br />Mrs. Nardi.ni su~gested that a letCer be sent to McDonal.d's on i:his <br />subjecC ori.th a copy Co the 55-r Club. <br />Juli.2n Mr. Carley i.ndicated that the letter reFardi.ng T.he .Juli.an Johnson <br />Johnson Company was for informati.on. 'I.'he Engi.neer sT.ated that the C;i.Cy is <br />Company bui.l.ding a fi.le on Chi.s matter. <br />Ap,enda Mr.s. Nardini. stated Chat the contracC date was December 31 and asl<ed <br />Item No< 7 wl~iat wi11 happen, i.f the Ci.ty wil.l wi.Chhold payments. 7'he ];ngineer <br />repl.i.ed Chat he w1.11 be di.scuss:ing this with the Ci.ty AT.torney. <br />Anderson Mr. Carl.ey reported that Che letter from the ltighway Department <br />Proper.ty concerni.ng the Anderson prop erty concerns a 1ar.ge tree on the <br /> property line. 'Che tree caas not removed as :iC ~aas f.elt that t:he <br />Ap,enda Anderson pr.operty woutd have to be. encroache d on~ and P1r. Ander.son <br />ICem No. 8 i.s very concerned about hi.s properi:y li.nes. <br />Mr. Carley sCated that during the watermai.n projecC and *,uideni.n~; of <br />Ri.ce Street the tree roots could have been cut and Mr. Carl.ey suggested <br />that the Ci.ty wai.t until Spr~i.ng to see if the tree survi.ves. <br />D1r. l~tanson commented t1.1at i.£ per.mi.ssi.on was aslced o£ Mr. ~nderson <br />he would J~robaUly have allowe.cl Y.he tree to be cut down. <br />Pa~e -8-- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.