Laserfiche WebLink
*1I\U7'I:S <br />Ci.ty Council, <br />Dec. 9, 1987 <br />Mrs. Re:ed asked the ~fect: the project would have on Che lalceshore. <br />Mr. R.ingrose replied tt~at the ~ipe w:il.l. be r.elaCivel.y shall.ow <br />in the area o,F the lalseshor.e. 7'he pipe wi11 be about ll to 15 <br />feet to Che bottom of the pi.pe in the area. Al.so, along the <br />lakeshore, the MSdCC would like to >tay as far from the l.alce as <br />possible. 'They ~aoul.d 1~.ilce Y_o stay about 20 to 25 feet f:rom the <br />cur.rent shore. <br />A member of. the audience aslced if the MWCC has considerFd running <br />the p-ipe :into Che lalce. Mr. Ri.nYrose staCed that theq have not. <br />The 'NSdCC would need a perrn~i_t. from the Corps of F,ng~.i.neer, to do <br />this and there mciy be ser:i.ous env:i.ronmental sCandards ef~"ectecl. <br />Al.so it woulcl he hard to contr.ol er.osi_on. <br />A member of the audi.ence stated Chat :if the pipe wer.e run l.0 feet <br />From the lakeshore, ~i.t would ef.fect vi.rtual].y no homeowners. ~Ir. <br />Ringrose staCed Chait th:is coul.d be loolced at, buC he did not want <br />to oversimpl~i.f.y th~is. There ~r.e environmental. issues ~nd probl.ems <br />in biai.ld.ing withi.n cl.osc: proxi.mi.ty to a lalce. <br />~~1r. Aanson asked the criteria for placing of. manholes. Mr. Rin~;rose <br />replied theit manholes would be needed £or connection points to tlte <br />Ci.ty's system. i'lanhol.es caill he neraded for access and mai_ntenance <br />about every 400 to 500 Eeet. <br />~lcs. Scal.ze stated that if Che MIdCC i.s wor.lcin, with the Co~mty on a <br />bike path, the Counci.l. woul.d like to look at Ch~is propossl. ~[r. <br />Ringrose staCed ch~t the County w~nts a better road than what was <br />in place xnd i.t may be that they just want a wide sltot.ilder. <br />Mr. Fahey astced Che C~ity Engi.neer's opi.nion on the proposal, the <br />route alternati.ves. ~1r. CarLey stated that in hi.s opini.on thc. <br />proposal was the most: f_easible way Co go. Mr. Paliey asked if therc <br />was an al.ternat.i.v<:, route. Tlze ?nginecr repl.i_ed not reall.y. 'I'he <br />lli.n~iway 36 r.oute i.s out of tlte questi.on as i.t is too expensi.ve. <br />TFie mai.n purpose of the proposal is to el.~i.mi.nate the ].i.f.t stati_on <br />and Che. proposal. presented ~i.s Che most feasible and effecCS the <br />least arnount o( people. <br />The Ci.ty Clerk aslced what h~ppens to the we11s i.n Che County Road <br />li-?_ area. Mr_. Ringrose replied thlt i,f, they disappear, Y,he P44•?CC <br />would connect the people up to the Ci.ty waP:ermain. ~ mcamber of: <br />Che 2udience st:atect th;;it many people i-n t.hc z;rea woiild prefer to <br />lceep Cheir wel.ls. Mr. Rin~rose reoli_ed tl~iat thr-. soorst that woul.cl <br />happen ;i.s that ther.e would be no water. clu:rin~; the construcC~ion <br />process. Flowever, the trenchi.ng ~v~ill be relativel.y ~hal.l.ow ancl may <br />not eff.ect the *.rells. <br />~1r. Ducharrne reported that most we11s in the arer~ ar.e 85 feet deep. <br />ifr. Ri.n~;rose staCed [hat they ~aoul.d be trenchiny; at a deepest elevati.on <br />of 50 feet. Tf. there~ was a problem with welJ.>, peop~le could be <br />temporari.l.y hool<ed uZ~ to C:i.ty waCer. <br />PaFe -7- <br />