Laserfiche WebLink
M7:~lU'C£S <br />City Council. <br />Dec, 22, 1982 <br />Anderson <br />Developm~nt <br />(Cont.) <br />?4r. ,. Scalze d:i.sagrced, and ].~i.sted other reasons thaG Ir[apleo-~ood <br />denied the pt'opos~l. Scal.zc stated thaf then Mr. Anderson proPoseci <br />20 l.ots and Maplewood rlenied the proposal for varLous r.easons. <br />Scal.re stated that Mr. t\nderson w:i.thdr.eca the ].7_ l.ot: proposal. because <br />o~F the f:i.nanci.al f.easibi.li.ey and Mr. ~'rattalonc clid not want. to <br />develop hi.s property. <br />i9rs. Scalze introduced t.h~ Lollowi.ns; reso~l.ut.i.on and moved i.ts adoption: <br />1"LPSOI,UTION N0. H7-~12-632 -~WS'CRUCTING TF1E CJ.TY <br />CLPRK TO SGND A LTT'TLIR 'CO TIIG; CITY OP MAPLTSd00D <br />1:N1~0i?MING 'fi~ITP4 TtfA'C TiV THIi PRF,SP;~'f FOP.i4 'L'Nr <br />C;Eit~7AIS OV~RLOO~C DI'sVI;LOPP47?N'L' DOr?S NOT ~PPi?AR TO <br />T3f's CONS:[STPDI~[•1IT'I I,TT'TLI? CANADA'S CO'~iPRr?iJiNS:CV)i <br />PL,A~] AND 'CI{li CITY WOUI,.,17 RFQUES'C T1IA'C ?dA',i'ER A10'C <br />i3I; CON~7ECTL,D f~'RON[ LS'CTLT CANAI)A iiCCAtISC; 'ChII's <br />q1RROtIND7:NG L07'S ARF LARGT.`'~R TI-tAN T~IHA9' IS PR07'0 i~D <br />APID TIIt? StJRP.Ol1VDIDiG ~P.isA :C3 SIDIGLL. FA^1ILY <br />RrSIDFDU'CIAL, ~ND DUi: 'PO T}IE INCP.F,AS1~1> "CR~i'F7.C <br />T71,A'1' .CFII6 DIsVTLOPM[:N'P rrlOULD CF,DihRATF, AND BLiCAUSP~ <br />RC1N-OI'T' A~D POI..S,U'CT,ON 'CO 'L'HP A12EA' S WP,TLANDu A/~S <br />NO'L P,EEDI A[)DRT:SST?D AD1D f3};CAUSE?, THP 4~2 UD]I'CS AS <br />PLZOPOiPD ARI3 NOT C01`~1SIS'CEN'C bLC'L}i Ttffi CITY' S <br />PRI;iENT PI,~NS OR 'CI-!A'C OF ?4API.rt~700D' S ANi) [3TCAI!>P <br />'C7~IE PROYOSEIL L~IAS N07' :NVOLVT;ll ACCI'';S i POR 'f1iE TiRINIC <br />]?ROPERTY <br />7'he Poregoi.nq resolution cv2s duiy secontl~d by ~lrs. Nardi.ni.. <br />Ayes (~4) Scalze, N1rdi.ni, Falzey, 19exnson. <br />A7ayes (0). <br />ResoLution dec,1.ared adopted, <br />Tl~iis reso7.iition appears in Resol.ution L'ool,c No. 8, 7?~.g~~~ 6~t1. <br />P,r.ady's ~loise 7'he C:iCy Cl.erl< raported that the C-.i.Cy has rece~,i.ved a complaint re~ar.ding <br />Complaint tl'~e noise at 73rady's. 'Che Clr..r?< ~reported ths.t Mr. 'Cul.gren h2s macte <br /> some improvernenLS to tl~e estnbli shmenc to correct Che pr.oblem. <br />9gendtt <br />Item ~o. 10 Mrs. Scal.ie commenCed Cl~at perhaps lirady's wi.'ll have to do some <br />poli.c,in,n, oI Che problem as :it is noC fai.r th<it Che Itamsey Coiu~~y <br />6her:LlE has to do th:is. <br />P4r. H~nson l~ointed out ti~a~ the City proposed to rezone Che trail.er <br />courCS to R-4, 1lowever, the Crailer court o~oners ~i.n t:h~ Cicy did not. <br />want Ch:is. 'Hsn>on as?ce~l if i.t w~xs fair to expect everything on [:he <br />part o,f. t.he bus~.lnesses in the area< Hanson askecl i.f. the mob-.ilehome <br />parlc should be, requi.red to provi.de some type of, bi.iff~r~.i.n,;. <br />Hr. Tahey stated that the mobilehome parlc coas [:Itex~e before ~rady's <br />~aas s;iven a].iquor 1.~i,.cense. T~"ahey statecl thaC '(3rady's came to tl:~e <br />cond:i.C~.on as ~it ex:i.sCed. <br />Pa~;e --10- <br />