My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-27-82 Council Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1982
>
12-27-82 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/27/2014 2:19:22 PM
Creation date
7/31/2009 2:49:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
`1Ni.J'CF:S <br />C~.ity Gouncil <br />Dec. 27, 19FS? <br />l~enei.bi.lity 'Che Ci.ty Cl.erk commFnted t:haC a i>order streeC, sucli as Itice Street, <br />12eports t,he assessmenC should be r_i.ed i.n wi_eh ~nother projece. <br />(Cont.) <br /> 1'he clcarl~ asked if the sewer and street on Sy:l.van were £i.gured <br /> at 100% lssessment. The S~ng:i.neer r.epl.i.ed that, thcy we re. Thc <br /> cos t for C:h:is orould be approximate'I.y :~52.00 per Lront fooC i.n addition <br /> to the caatermai.n assessmenC. <br />!1r. T'ahey si.ig~est;ed Ch~t per'!~ia~s th~ Ci.Cy should commun~i.cate to <br />pFOple C:F~at effecCive Ju1y 1. th~ C~i.ty's new poli.cy on a,sessm~nLs <br />wi1l. be ar lOQ%. <br />birs. Sca1.ze ~i.ntroduced the i~ollowinf3 resolut~ion an<t nioved [ts adoptton: <br />R.TSOI.,U9'ZOi~ N0. 8?-12-641. - ACCIIYTIDiG 7'Ht? <br />tp;;1ST87I,:f'['Y REPO`:TS AS SU13?~(TT"CIiD J3Y f.Fil: CI'!'Y <br />E\iG.CNRI;I:. ON 7`-1P?ZOVli~413\Tfi N0. fi3--1~ Ly~ 7~ fi <br />nri~ 9 <br />'Che fores;oi.nf; resoluCion was duly seconded by Mrs. iVardi.ni.. <br />Ayes (4.) Scal.ze, Nardi.n:i., ]?ahey, H~.inson. <br />~(ayes (0). - <br />ResoluC.i_on decl.ared aclopted. <br />'Ch:i.s reso7.ut~i.on appears i.n 'Resol.ution Iloot: No. ~i, ?'age 651. <br />i~1r. P<tlley then suggesCed that ~crhaps tl~e Ci.ty' , pol.icy should be <br />C1iat ef.fec.t:ive .Tuly 1, 1984~ where a peti.t:Lon was pr.evi.ously considered <br />for F~atermain and deni.ed, the City's poli.cy wil.1 be 7.0~% assessment, <br />Al,o, Che Ci.ty's C~o1_icy wi7_1 be 1.00% assessment on aL:L new streets. <br />E~ahe.~ suh~;ested Chat ~ not:i.ce to tl'ri.s ef£ect be put ouC in Che sesver <br />bi.1.7.s. <br />~~ir. t~lanson stat:ed tl~iaC the not~i.ce sl~ould say th~it cons:i.dEr~Cion i.s <br />bei.ng ~;i.v~n to adont~ing Chi.s po1.9.cy< ~tr. I~ahey aprecd. <br />Mr. I-tanson su„~;ested [hat the City C1erk pt.it a notice toocCher to <br />thi.s ef[ecC. <br />7'he {j,n~incer suKgested that the hcar~i.ngs b~ hel.d the f:i.rst meeti.n~ <br />i.n ]?ebiruary. <br />~1r. Pahey ~i.nC~ro<iuced the ,fol.l.ow;i.n~ resoluti.on and moved ~ita adopt~ion: <br />i21iSOS.~UTION ~iQ. F?_-12-642 - RESC7ry7y~~~.~7r <br />RPSOI,UTION D10. i3'L-12-G10 <br />The foregoi.n~; resolut.i.on was duly seconded by C-ir. H.anson. <br />Ayes (4) F~h~yy Hanson, Scal.ze, P7ardini. <br />idayes (0), <br />Re.so1.uC:ion clec7.e~red adopted. <br />'Chi> reso7.ut:ion appear.s i_n R~sotuti.on T3oolc No. 8, F'aige 652. <br />Page -?p_.. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.