Laserfiche WebLink
~4TNU'l'tsS <br />Ci.Cy Counci.l. <br />Dec. 27, 1982 <br />Anderson 29r. Anclerson po;i.nCed out Chat DiCCh 7 runs throuph his pro~~erLy and <br />DeveLoprnent that 1~i.s pror>erty talces the run-off from a 1ot of surrounctl.ng properly. <br />((;~n~.,) P1r. Aridersort staCed tNi?t )ie d~es noC war~t to saturaCe his property <br /> caith development_, biit does hc~ve the r.ip,ht Co do something wich his <br /> property. <br />;~7rs. Scalze sCat~d th~t Li.etle Canada ~gr.eed to gi.ve Anderson water, <br />when hecame in wi.th a].2 lot proposa7.. ~1r. Anderson d~i.sa~reed w:ith <br />rhis. <br />Mr'. Pahey stated Chat the ~lnderson propos~l malses no provi.si.on for. <br />Cl~e development of the I.,~i.CCle Canada properCy to the north. Pahey <br />staeect that he w1s noz willing to ~rant water unti.l this was done. <br />1~ahey al.so staCed that the devel.opment was noC consistenC wit}.t Li.Ctle <br />C~nad2's coa~prehens:i.ve plan. <br />iKr.. Anderson sCated that he caas not going Co havc Di_tch 7 go th.r.ou~;h <br />h-[s ~roperty ~.if he coi.ilc{ not p,et cooper2tion. Mrs. Sc~1ze srat~d <br />[hat Li.tt7.e Canada has:nothing Co do wi.th ~.~hether or not Ramsey County <br />i.s goi_ng to chainae tne~ir di.cch. <br />24r. Anderson sCate<i that the Ci.ty ot: Maplecaood senC hi.m to Ti.t4_le Canada <br />Co determ~i.ne whether or noC I,i.ttle Canada wi.11 gi.ve h1.m water. <br />Pat~iey stated that there tis rnor.e slt:urati.on ~oi.Ch the proposeci 42 uni.ts <br />tt~~n the pr~viou>l.y proposed 12 lots. <br />Ntrs. Scalze .,t~ated. that t:he Map~lewood planner wil7. not scliedule a <br />h~ar~ing un[il. Idttle Canadc~ indicates their f.eell.ng;s on the water <br />i.ssue. i~1rs, Scal.ze stzited r1~at L,itCl.e Canada indicateci thtaC they <br />~vould grant ~aaCer on tl,ie 12 l.ot development if, thr ~ir.,inl< pr.opex'ty <br />was not 1andloc!ce~d. <br />Mr.. I'ahey stated thsL he thoaght tl~ie Ci.ty deni_ed Chc water becat~,e <br />of CYie P,ri_nlc property. <br />~Ir. Anderson staLed thaC Mr. U'rinlc ~i.s wi.llin~ to sell o[f. the back of <br />his property. Anderson stz~t.ec( that he wanCed Co make sur.e there was <br />suffi.ci.ent u,e of the lHnd and accer~s to surround~.Ln~ ].and. <br />Mr. Hanson aslced i.f P4apl.ewood would ~11ow wel.1.s. 1Nr. Anderson <br />replied that they caould li.kE~ not to. <br />P~Ir. Fahe.y asl<ed how m~ny of the proposed 47_ uni.[s would ,o o~~ the <br />Anderson propErty. p1r. Ancterson repl-i_ed a~pr.oxi.mately 7_2 uni.ts <br />:i.n add-i.ti.on t.o Iii.s house. '~9r.s< Nardini. sCai~.cd t:hat:. accordi.n; to <br />her plan iC looked l.i.l<e 24 units. Mr. Anderson sCated that Che <br />plan was a concepk drawi.ng. <br />`Qrs. ~Iardi.ni ind~icatecl that the or~ioi.nal. plan included some property <br />of Pranlc f'ratCa7.one. <br />Page --8- <br />