Laserfiche WebLink
e~ znu~rrs <br />Ci.Cy Counci.l <br />S~eb. 23, 19II3 <br />G7aY:ermai.n Mr.. PaLiey poi.nCed out, ho~oever, tk~at the peop7.e across Che str.eet <br />Ae~ri.n~s would be asses&ed~ if tl~e developer owned more than 50% of. tl~ie <br />(Cont.) land i.nvolved. <br />A mr..mber of. Che eiudi.ence st:.at~d thaC in that case he would be i.n <br />f.tivor oE the improvement: anct pay today's rate, rather than rates <br />i.n the f:uture. <br />14rs. Scalz.e point:ed out L!~at she has seen other. ci.ti.es put i.n <br />improvements when onl.y 25% of the people are i.n favor o1' it. Scalce <br />staCFd that the Ci.ty Counci.l l:iseens to tkie people an<i w:i11 <br />approve an i.mprovemenC cahen 50% of: the people are i.n f:avor. <br />Mr. Rarr.ieau commenCed that the Picha property i.s compri.sed oL <br />singl.e family 7.ots ~ind cLid not. f.eel one developer would develop <br />tli:i.s propcrty. <br />v <br />Mr. Hanson coinmentecl that the concensus appears to be that orr one <br />is intere,ted i_n water on Greenbr:i.er. <br />~trs. Nard-Lni stated that she did not r.ecall. Ch~t Che C:ity decided <br />not: to ~o a~i_th the 100% assessinent poli.cy. Mrs. Scal.zc po:inted ouC <br />that the Council deci.ded to thinlc about: it. Scal~e stated that :i:f: <br />she were a tlxpayer who has p;ic.lced up 20% of improvements for many <br />years and then wanted to devr:.l.op property anc.l had to pay a 1.00% <br />assessment, skte toould noC be very kzappy about i.t. Scalze si.ig~;est~:d <br />s~ign~±,~_ed that: perhaps the poli.cy ,hould not be changed unt.i.l the <br />Cit:y ~i.s completely water.ed. <br />Mr. Fahey commented Ch2C tic agreed. <br />A member of the aiud:i.ence astced who woulcl pziy for the A11.en Avenue <br />~frontage. The ci_Cy Clerk r.eplied ChaC thi.s is C~ity propert:y~ and <br />therefore not assessed but spl.it amon~ property owners. <br />P1r. }lylanct i.ndi.cateci that tie was not in favor of the i.mprovcmertt. <br />A member of the audi.ence indicated thaC the Hegners are ouC-of-town <br />but are also opposed to watermain. <br />@Zr. Fahey int:r.oduced the followi.ng resolution and moved its adoption: <br />Ri,SOLU'CION N0. f33-2-80 - CLOSING TkIP 'PUT3I,SC <br />H)iA12:CNG OD1 IMPI:OVP:MPN7' N0. f33-7 <br />T'he foregoin,v, resoluti.on was duly second¢d by Mrs, Nardini.e <br />Ayes (5) 7?ahey, Nard:i.ni., Flanson, Scalze, Porsber~. <br />Nayes (0). <br />Resolut:ion declar.ed adopted. <br />'Chi.s resolut:i.on appears i.n Resoluti.on llool< No. 9, Yage 89. <br />Page _..1.0- <br />