Laserfiche WebLink
rn~r~iu•rFs <br />c;.ty co~.~„~;_i <br />Peb. 73, 19F33 <br />Watermain <br />Aearings <br />imp. P1o. <br />£33-9 <br />Agenda <br />Item \o. 9 <br />A1r. I-leinson opened the publ.ic hear.in; on thc i.mprovemenC of: Count:y Road <br />D ~F,.rom Ar.cade to Lal3ore. <br />'f.he Ci.ty C7.er.1< reported that Mr. 7'ooslte does not: object to water and <br />has 600 feeY. on ~rcade Street, <br />Janni.e r.ind I.,unz.er~ i.nd_i.czieed f_hat tkiey were i.n favor of water. <br />Mr.. T%ahey introduced the .fol.l.ow~ing resoluti.on an<t moved ir, adoption: <br />RJ;SOLUTION N0. 83-2-32 - CLOSING 7'HF, PIJRLIC }tL;AI2ING <br />ON Ih1PROVEMPNT N0. 53-9 <br />Tk~e f:oregoi.n~ resoluti.on was dul.y seconcied by hlr.s. Scal.ze. <br />Ayes (5) Tahey, ical.ze, Hanson, Nardin:i, 1'or;berg. <br />~ayes (0). <br />Resolution cieclarecl adopted. <br />This resol.ution ~ppears :i.n Resol.ut~ion i3oolc No. 9, Pag~ 91. <br />A memUer of the audience a,l<ed :i.f. t:he~re w~s an error i.n the c~.tl.culations <br />b,nsed on the f:ootc-ige under Imp. No. S3-].. 'Che Lngi.neer repl:ied that <br />Chere woul.d be LSoO feeY, of watermai.n pf.pe wi.th 247.5 feet o:f assessable <br />f.oota~e. <br />'.Che Engineer reported that Cher.e would be an equ~1 assessmenL on <br />Di,anna Lane for each 1ot: based on 1 f:igur.e of 110 fcet per 7.ot. <br />The Engi.neer reported thac without Gree.nbrier StreeC in tl~ie i.mE~rovement, <br />the as,essment per fron[ £oot ~vould now be $35.00 per f:ront.f:ooC. <br />'Che En~;i.neer k~ointed out that the City ~aill take bids on the projecte <br />Mrs. Nardi.n:i. asked about the restorati.on of Dianna Lane. 'I'he L:n~;:i.neer <br />stated t:hat: i.t would not malce a bi.;; cli.f~f:erence :i.n the cost: of the <br />PT'~Ject. <br />PQr. De~sai po:inCed ouC that the outlot would not benef:it t>y the <br />;improvement. <br />'Che I~(~yor poiated o~t tha~t Imp. No, 83-L and 83-4 were ~.initi.ated <br />b~ pet;i.tion and only requ~,ire three votes for passa~e. 'fhe othie~r <br />projects were ~i.n~it:i.ated by Council act:i.on and requi.re four votes. <br />~1r. P~I1ey suggested that the Council. el~iminate Creenbri.er from the <br />project but reta:in County Roncl D. N[r. T'ocsberg su~gested that, the <br />f.ul.l :Cmp. No. £33-7 be el:i.mi.nated. <br />7'he Ci.ty Cl.eric st.ated that the Count:y Road D secti.on was i.ncluded i.n <br />both Imp. No. £33-8 and £33-9, <br />7?age -12- <br />