04-27-83 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

rrz~uics City Council April 27, 19£33 North Mr. Schrier would have to be compensat:ed. Mr. Dobney aLso poi.nted out Suburban Chat the townhouses and quad un~its proposed would Ue owner-occupied. Corp. (Cont.) Thi.s i.s also true of the duplex unit. Dobney poi.nted out t:hat the proposal Provides Eor a gradual downzoni.ng f.rom the multiples on the east to the single family housing on the west. Mr. Dobney al.so stated that the City can veri:Ey the number of units proposed by Mr. Schri.er easily as there is a re~;istered survey on f.ile with che City. Mr. Pahey asked i.f a porti.on of the proposed townhouses were on what is now R-1 property. Mr. Dobney repli.ed that this was Crue. Dobney pointed out that this proposal does not increase the number. units a1lo~aed under the propert.y's present zoning. Mr. Dobney stated that they ar.e requesti.ng that a por.tion of the R-3 zoni.ng be chan~;ed to R-7_ and a port:ion of: the R-1 z.oni.ng be ck~anged to R-2. Mr. Dobney pointed out that the Planni.n{; Commission has recommended that concept approval be granted. 44r.s. Nardini. aslced if. the R-3 zoni.n~ ran from County Road C to the water. Mr, Dobney repor.ted that it di.d. Mr. Pahey asked how many units would be allowed under the present R-3 zoning. Mr. Schrier replied that 150 apartment units wouLd be allowed under the present zoning. l7nder the R-1 zonin~; presently in place either 27 or 79 unit5 would be allo~aed. Mr. Don Pi.erce pointed out that the lalce talces up a portion of. the property bei.ng discussed. Mrs. Nardi.ni. pointed out that i.f the concept were approved, the high water marks would still. have [o>>e abided by, Mr. Pierce asked if the property in the lalce was being included in determining the density allowed. Mr. Schrier repli.ed that it was not. Mr. Fahey felt that i:he proposal. ~•~ould create a problem forthe City as when the Prattalone property develops, Mr. I'rattalone ~aould proUaUly [hen ask for an upzoning of hi.s property. Mrs. Nardi.ni commented that she felt there was more potential for owner-occupied d~aeLlings ~oith the qua<ls and townhouses, than with more apar.tments. Mr. Schrier stated that this was true. Mr.. Dobney statect is ~;ood p].annin~. apartments to the occupied with the our. that a refusa housing butted up thaT. the proposal being presented i.s what they feel There i.s a stepping down of the densi.ty f:rom the single family. A11 of. the units would be owner- exception o£ the apartments. Mr< Dobney pointed to change the zoninp, will result i.n single family a~;ainst apartments. Yage -4-