Laserfiche WebLink
~1TNfI'CI?S <br />Ci.ty Counci.l <br />May 7.7., 1~£33 <br />Personnel <br />Orcti.nance <br />~;endet <br />Item No. 39 <br />Mr. Pahey subrni.tted to the Counc~.il a proposed ,Personnel Or.dtnance <br />wh~i.ch he put toz;ether ~'f:or theis consi.<IeratLon. Mr. I'al,tey reported <br />that tlze Ordinance prov~ides that a pcrson cannoc saork fu17.--Ci.me <br />and part:.-ci_me for Che City wiChout app,roval. o£ d~ie Council. Fllso <br />no overt~Lme wi_].1. be pa~id i.n Chese situations axcept cahen t:he work <br />raeek exceecls 4-f3 hoars. C-(r.. Pahey reported that State 1aw s~ys <br />overCime must. be pa~,Ld t:or liours i.n e~xcess o,f. 48. ?2r. Fahey stated <br />that: comp ti.me can be ~;ranted, but th~.i.s does noC malce se,nse :i.n <br />terms of. a parb-t~irne ~osi.tion. <br />The At[orncy reporte~l tl1aC th~.is ~i.s as good an attempt to address <br />the recent issi.ies made and not run i.nto State 1aw, 7'he At:t~.orney <br />camnented that: [he Ci.ty uri.11 not lcnotv how thi.s ordinance coinpli.es <br />w:i1J.t State law unta.l i_t i.s tested. <br />i4r. Pahey poi.ritecl out thae ori :i.ts face i.t does not appear to violate <br />Stette J.aw. <br />Mr. Sweeney stated that State ].aw does not cover a muni.ci.pal employee <br />worki.n; in tr.ao capaci.ties. <br />Mr. Pahey commented that the Ci_Cy <br />Dra?<e f.or hi.s worki.n~; siCUat~.ion. <br />shoul.d be dirrect:ed t:o s~e th2t Mr <br />f.~or tl;~e CiCy in a given week. <br />h1s an impl.ied contract wi_Ch Dan <br />P{r< ['at~ey staCe<I ttiat Mr. ilorelan <br />Dralce does noC ~aox~tc over ~s£3 hours <br />A4rs. Nardi.ni, stated ttiat the Counci.l i.s aw,zre of the fact that therc; <br />may be a legal. problem. <br />Mrs. Scalze aslced :[f tkie ord~inance evas wri.tten around Mr. Drake's <br />situat:i.on. i4r< Pahey stated that t1~e ordi.nance ~•ras wri.tten Co mzilce <br />the Ci.t:y's system *aork, <br />Nir. Chl.ebeck poi.nted out that other ci.ties have the same si.tuati.ons <br />r:ind have had no probl.ems. <br />~Ir< Pahey stated that ~i_f: the Counci.l is not. happy wi.tki Chese t:ypes <br />of si.tuati.ons where f:ul.l.-t~i.me employees worlc in part-~t:i.me capaciCi.es <br />the Co~mc~il. can say uo. <br />Mr. l~orsber~ asi:ed i.f. the ord:inance covered the si_tuation where Ckie <br />part-ti.me nositi.on interfered with the ful.l-time position. Kc•. <br />T'ahey stat:ed that thi.s was covered. <br />T4r. Forsberg suggested that the C~ity Attornc.y revi.eu~ the ordi.nance. <br />'Che ACtorney suggested Chat the Counc~il. review any changes in two <br />weel<s ti.me and then he ~aould put the ordinance ;i.n the propcx I~orm <br />for adoption< <br />Pa~;~ -24... <br />