Laserfiche WebLink
tiTP]UTES <br />C:i.ty Cotmc~i.1 <br />May 11., 1983 <br />Norta <br />Suburban <br />Concept <br />Plan (Cont.) <br />7'he T'lanner stated that he is not i.n a pos~i.ti.on to judge total. uni.t <br />count unCi1 tlle Council c~n gi.ve the applicant directa.on on the. <br />trnnsi.t~i.onal lani use acc~pCabil.ity. 'Che Planner i.ndicated Chat: the <br />applicant needs Counci.l. directi.on. <br />The Planner also poinCed out thaC Mr. Schrier coul.d bu:i.ld 150 <br />apartment units on hi.s R-3 property and use thc entire R-L property <br />f.or dra~i.nage requi.rements. The number of: ~mi.ts coul.d exceed the <br />transition type. of: acti.v~i.ty. <br />The Planner stated that he f:eel.s the transi.C~i.onal. zoni.ng atternpts to <br />resolve the issues as much as they can be resolved. <br />Mr. Denni.s Dc~ody appearecl bef'ore the Council.. Mr. Doody present:ed the <br />Counci.l wi.th a hi.story of. the property be~ing discussed and how i.t <br />obtai.ned the zoni.ng that ~i.t currentl.y has. Y4r. Dnody also eYplai.ned <br />the morator.i.um that was set: on t:he bui.ldi.n~; of apartments by a <br />prev.i.ous Counc~i.1.. <br />N[r, Doody questioned the amount of R-3 property that Mr. Schri.er <br />claims that he has. TAr. Doody poi.nted out the traf:fi.c problem that: <br />would be caused by the clevelopment. Mr. 1.)oody also po~inted out that <br />Mr. Schrier has sold Che triangular pi.ece of: nroperty he owned whi.ch <br />was al.so zoned R-3, <br />Mr. Doody statect thaC the C:i.ty's ordinance states Lhat one of: i.t:s <br />re~sons for existence i.s to preserve tk~e property values in the <lity. <br />Mr. Doody requested that when t_he Council acts on the matter be£ore <br />it, ehe Counci_1 do something f:or the peopl.e on this side of the. <br />Ereeway. <br />Mr. Fahey commented that :i.t looked lilce there wr.re some competing <br />i.nterests amonK the nei_ghborhoods in the area. <br />Mr. Bergstrom pointed out that the R-3 prop<~rty was est:abl~i.shed over <br />the arguments of the ne:i~;hbors. rlr. Flerpstrom sCaCed that the Iona <br />I..ane people di.d not want tt~e P-3 iri the f~~rst place, but wanC tti~e <br />I~-1. to remai.n as a buf.fer to Iona I,ane. <br />Mr. Fahey asked if the Stark ~ind Ruth Street residents war~C the number <br />of apartments reduced whil.e the Iona Lane residents iaant the R-1 <br />properCy to rema~i.n et> i.s. <br />Mr, P'al~ey staCed that thE Planner's proposal was much more sCtr~ctive <br />to hi.m than irir. Schr.ier's. <br />Mr.. Doody asl<ed where tlie parlc was that t1r. Schrier is requi.red Co <br />provi.de under the Parlc Ordi.nance. <br />Mr. Fahey pointed out Chat the Park Commissi.on has requesCed th~t a <br />cash donati.on be made rather. than l.and. <br />Page -4- <br />