Laserfiche WebLink
p~ J~!Ij'CEg <br />C:i.ty Counci.l. <br />Kay 25, 1933 <br />Schricr N(r. 'I'akxcy po~inted out that the Oounc~il t.urned down the ori.ginal <br />Proposal proposal. ior D:i.zmna Lanc: as the clFnsi.ty wa, t:oo vre~t. <br />(Cont.) <br />ti(rs. Nar~li.ni. di.d not agree *~ri.Ch thi.s compari.son a, the ~rea oras <br />~already 1.~2 acre lots rand tf~e Counc~i_:I. just extended tk~i.s coi~tcept. <br />Mrs. ~larclini. comizicnCe.d tt~at t h~ C~ity must 1.-i.ve wi.th what was done <br />in 196~3. lardi.ni. stated. [hat the Coun~:il. m~ist Cak~ Che word of. i.ts <br />~rofa:,s:i_onal,. Mrs< iVardini. st:ated that s he ~vould l.ilce to cut <br />doHm the num~~er of. apartmenCS and benc>.Eit tk~e nei.gh borhood. <br />h1r. Pahey staCe~l tt~iat he telt b~sed on recenG court act~ions, the <br />Cit:y st~ou7.d rezone~; the proper[y. <br />P~fr. E~orsberc; poinCed out tkiat the proper ~vay to develop Che. area <br />woul.d be to open up Iona Lane. <br />"Qr, Hanson stnted that ~ vote a;ai.nst the project: i.s ra vote for <br />hi.~her densi.Cy, N[r. 1~'ahey di.sa,p.,reed. <br />~4r. Lichc poi.nted out th~t the Coi.irlcal must ].ook at che land ase <br />cap~.ibil;i.ti_es, the i.raffi_c s~ituat.ion, dr_ainap,e s~i.ruet-ion and overall <br />access. Licht stated Chat in ter.ms of l.and use capabi.liCies, <br />~it is not <tesi.rab',le t:o 1~ave .,:n~;le f-1mi.ly l~io~nes a~,atinst aipartments. <br />I'rom thi.s stant,lpoi..nt t}ie stepped-d~wn concept is ~osit~.i.ve. T1~ie <br />traffi.c si.t.uuti.on would be i.morov~d with 96 apart.ment ~miCS veesus <br />1.4~~J. 'Ckte concept of, quads and townhouses would encour.as;e homeownerska~ip. <br />t~ir. i,i.cht statecl that ~;:iven m11 these F~ctors, Che stepoed-down <br />conceuC i.s posi.cive. <br />Mr. PaPiey statPd that no one :i.s di.sa;reein; ~aith this, buC he was not <br />in f.avor o,f the density proposed. Pahey asked how long the cul-de-sac <br />woiald be on the R-3 property. <br />P1r> Daubney repl.ied thaC ;i.[ ~aould noi: be a cul.-de->ac, b~,it a piri.vate <br />sf_reet. <br />Mr. i~or.sber~ stated that he was for Che three 37_-uni.C apartment <br />bui.ld~i.n~s because they represent 1e.ss apartrnents. <br />Mrs. Scalze ast<ed aboat tPie outlet Co Chez L'ratt~lone pr.oper[y. ~hr. <br />Daubney r.ep].i.ed that Mc. Schrier cannot plan ~~ratCalone's property <br />f.or hi.m. D~ubney suggested that some f.uture access could be drawn <br />i.n. <br />Mr. flanson astced about the possi.bi1.i.ty Chat N[r. Frat:t:alone woul_d not <br />w2nt the accees where the Ci.ty i.s proposin~. <br />~Ir. Schrier po~inCed out that the Copography i-., such t:~~iat ~r., Pr~itt~lone <br />croi.ilcl need a 7.ot of di.rt i.n his property. ^1r. Schri.er st:ated th~t <br />he f:el.C i.t wou].d 1ci11. the Pratt:.alone devel.opment possi.bil.iT.ie.s to <br />requi.rc. thi.s access. <br />Page -12- <br />