05-25-83 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

M f \tU'I' P: S Ci.l:y Counci.l "Giy 2 i y 1.983 I?eather Oz~'cs & 'lra i.na};e (Cont:.) '~ir. ChtebE_cfc statcd thlt che probl.er~ ~vou1<~1 have be~n ttaere even wichout Sleepy Ho).].ow. 24r. &lanson aeked how much mai.ntenance the~ 1~1_t stati_on .aoulct require. T'hE k;ngineer YePl.icd that t}iere would be mai.ntenance costs. 1-lo~aever, the l.ift: seati.on w~il1. si.t i.dl.e Lor maybe ye1r, at. a t~.ime< How~>,ver, the UCi_7.it:y DeparCment tvi.l.l. he~ve to br snre. it i_s ~i.n condi_t:ion to run should i_t be ne.edecL The Prigineer di.d not: ,Ee.e1 that the scation o~ill. require mucli ma~i.ntenanc~-~. ?9r. H~nson comment.c.d th~lt: everyti.me the City anproves ~~ bui.1.eti.n~; l~~ermit, it :i.nc,raases ~i.ts tax base and ouC of chaC ta~ basc, the City has a respons~i.bi.l.:i.ty to J~rovi.de servi.cc~s. '1rs. Scal.ze stated thaC ,he as;reed, l~ut not w:i_tli pi.clci.ng; up Chr assessments f.or e1~e f.o4~nhouses. 7'11e E:n~;:ineer staC.ed Cheit: he has on;ly tallced to the parties ~aith t:he b<< asse,sm~nt's. Mr. Carlev st:aCed tha[. i.n t~vo o~eelcs timc, he sho~,il.d have more anscoers. t4r. Paricy comroenCed Chat: 41eat.her Oaks ~aould ].il,<e anp~'oval. to go f:orward. The Ci.P:y Planner poi.nted out tP~at IleaCher O~ks ~s ugreeabl.e to ~~art:~i- ci.paCi_n~, in t!~e cira:i.nage project. 'Che 1?l.anner siir;~ested that CP~c C~ity gi.ve a7~proval for Phase I o,f the proJect and. make the approvai contin~enC up t:~he 1?,n4i_neer's lpproval of pond~ing. "Phe Pl.anner ~~l.so po~~.nted out that Clie I~lighway DePart.ment: i.s agreeable to orh~Tever f:J,ie ci.Cy w2nCS in terms of: clrai.nagc and curb cuts. l~at~ey stateet th2~t the Ci.ty cannot ho'I.d u~p [le~ther O~ilcs in~lefi.ni.tely. r'ors4~er,ry com!nene<ad tliat HeaCher Ozilcs ma~ not htrve a way t.o drain the:ir propert.y. 'Che P7.anner stated Chat FIeaY~a~er Oalcs caxi conta~i.n C}~~ w~~tFr fcom T'hase I. c7r. i~ari.cy noinCed out tLiat Chey are aslci.n~, for a 20 foot: setbaclc fro~n the ri.r,ht-of-w~y. The i?l,~tnner pointed out the excess ri.ght-of- way t:he Jl.i.ghoray 1'Jep~rtmen[ has i.n tlitis a.rea. Mr. Pa~ri.cy po~inted ouC tl~zlt the C~ity woi.il.d ~;~i.n morc. green area. ~4rs. Scal.zc asked ~aPaat. reason ttie CiCy could ase, f:or ~;raritin4; t:he v~r:i_ancc. The '?1~nner- repltied that public acC-i_on c•rouJ.cl be tkie reason. Mrs. Scalze no~intFd out Chat tl~~e pcople on I~iuwood liad to bui.l.d back Prom a 1.1ege ri~llt-of-way. Mr. L:i_cht sCated that the r,eason for the vxri.ance would be excess right-of aay. P4r. 1lanson stat.e_d Chat he had no probl.em w~Ith Gh~i_,. i•irs. Scalze sLlted t1,1at sl~e could not supporC t:he var~i.ance. The Planner point:ed out Cl:iat thc Cit~ should app~rove th~ plan over.al.J. wi.th 2,~~proval for tne construction o,t nhase I. Al.so th~;re i.s approval needecL Lor t:he subd:i.v~isi.on ancl tl,ze v,ariance for Che f.ront yard setbaclc. P~~e -7J-