05-25-83 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

~~rr.~tl'rrs c;.cy cou„ci.J. ~tay 25, 19£33 ~rcenbrier ?-fr. Forsb~zrg reporte~l tlaat Ct1e blact<COp pl.ant:s 1i~~~ve only bce~n in C,ir.cle (Cont.) ope:e~tion for t~ao or t:hree weeks. 'Che Ci.ty 2~as no contro7. over tt~i.s. S~orsberg al.so re.port.ed that 'Potal Asphalc, who is one o£ Che sub- contr.~cCOrs, is a 1arpE contractor and does a. ~;ood job. I'or.sber~ pointed ouC that ttie work has not been acceptecl and `uas not been pai.d Eor. Mrs. Naed:i.ni. i.ntrocluced the fol.low~i.ng resolut:ion and moved ~i.ts ~dopt:i.on: RY.S6I.dITIOP? D70. 83-5--7_19 -'I'A!3L~1.~G AC'CION ON 'CHE GRl?PA~`1RIti~R ('I72C,LE CtJ?;Ii:C~dG YI'TIT~COtd POR 'fid0 lJI;PKS SO 'L91A'C 7'Hlil CITY i2\C'TD1F;F.(? CAN Dl?TfiR~'(I\~T; 'C}lt; LF.~G9'li Of,~ 'CID'[~ T3E'si'OP,l: G101t!C IS COi~'tPI~F9'13D ODI 'CH}? STttTTs'C '~3Y JUL7ADt J01-IPdS061 CODi;T'_2lJC'L':COPI COMPt1NY AND SO '1'Ht'i C~GI~.~ff?ER CAN ilIi'i'I~R?17:NE Tl-TP:. COS'C PER I'RON'C FOOT OF :CNSTALL~AT:CON OT 7'14li RLACICLOP CUiLi3ItdG W11f3~ ~'tl~ CON'C;I,2ACT012 GiAS ON TFIT JOtl The foregoi.n~ resoluC~i.on ~Nas duly seconded by Mrs. Scalze. Ayes (5) Nardi.ni, Scalze, taanson, 1'orsber~;, Fahey, Naycs (0). ttesolut:ion declared adopt:ed. 7'h~i.s resoLut::i.on zippears :i.n P,esol.ut:~.i.on ?3001; Dlo, 9, Ysige 7_60. 'Pt~ie City Clerl< repor.ted Chat ].asC year i.n or.d~-~r for t:he proj~>ct: to proceed conY.i.nuously a 100% petiC~i.on was neecled. T}~is was not: recei.ved. Mr. Van Norman reported tt~at the curbi.ag on the east s~i_de of. the street. was repl.aced. 'Phe Cl.erk repl.ied that_ Chi.s w~~, a11 Che Ci.ty w~s 7.i.able for. The cl.erk poi.ntecl out i.:h~.t the ].00% peti.Y_ion was needed 1.asC yeax duc to t:he ti.m~i.n~;. 7'he 0lerlc al.so reportecl tt~at the blaclctop curb:Cng was a p~irt of the total watermaiv }~rojecC and had the C~ity not ~i.nsCallec.l it, they would not have received a reduct:i.on i.n the price of the nroject. The I?n~,ineer po:i.nted out tk~ai: when P~rl< ;treet project. was talcen away Crom T_he contracCOr, it took i:t~e City a year t:o get a new contractor Co ~finish the job. Mr. FaP~ey stated that 11e d~ic.l not feel it was the C:i.ty's responsibi.l~.iCy to d<~~duct any ~~orti.on of the bl.ac'ctop curb becausr_ Che resi.dents got a pet:~i.C~i.on i.n too lat;e. Pahey stated that the curb probably ,hould not have been puC :I.n, but the Ci.ty ~aould not: have receivecl a reducti.on in tYie price of. the proJect. P'ahey suggested that the res~idents come i.n ~ai.th another pet:i.t=i.on noC ].i.mit.i.ng the amount o£ the c~st of Che concrete curb. Pa;e -5-