My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-14-83 Council Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1983
>
09-14-83 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/3/2009 1:56:51 PM
Creation date
7/31/2009 2:49:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
rr~~nrrrs <br />c;~cy coun~~~. <br />Sept. ].4, 1983 <br />Good Nei~;hbor P4r. Vi.lancl poi.nted ouC that govex•nment, r.egulator.y agenc~ies and <br />I-lome Care constm~ers are encouraff~i.ng alternati.ve ways t:o prov~(.d~ car.e Lor <br />Center (Cont.) the el.der.l.y< <br />Nfr. V~i.l~nd stated t:hat: he would l.ilce t:o ad<Iress some of the concerns <br />Cl1at ~ver.e r.ai,ed ~t the August 1.6 c.ommunity m°etin; and ~t the August <br />24 Counci.l meeti.n;< <br />'Che fi.rsC is the ownerslii~ o£ Good \ei~,hbor. It is oc,med privutel.y <br />by five i.ndtivi.dual.s, four of which are businessmen :i.n the Twi.n <br />Cities. <br />The next concern was that of. property val.ues. P1r.Vi1euld sCat:ed that <br />he has copies of: two researc)i studi.es and references to others <br />~ahi.ch conclude that property values <to not go do~art and turn over <br />rates of pr.operty do not inc~-e<ise and tkie ti.me Co se11 a propecty <br />does not :i.ncrease due t:o Laci.l.iCies of. i:hi-s type i.n a nei;hborhood. <br />The next concem was Che poLenti.al fuCUre use of the properLy, N(r. <br />Viland repor.ted that Good Neighbor was agr.eeable to enCer :into a <br />restricti.ve convenant wliich would prov~ide that the use of: the <br />property ~~roulclf;o Uefore the Counci.l for apProval should Good <br />\cighbor cease i.ts use o£ the property. ?:r. Vi.l.and stated Chat <br />Good Nei.gkibor k~ad no i.ntenCion of uYi.l.izing the proper.ty for a hal.f- <br />cvay house. T71ere i.s no public funding that would be adequate to <br />support a property of thi.s value. <br />Mr. Vi.land stated that the home proposed requir.e;; no variances. It: <br />*.oould be used by Che handi.capped and, ther.e~fore, more conveni.ent to <br />Che able-bodied. <br />7'}ie concern ~vas raised that tkie property would never se11 as a si.n~;le <br />family dwelling. Mr. V.i.land pointed out tt~at several people have <br />1~reed that the hou,e would be very saleabl.e as si.np,le f.amily. <br />Another concern to be addressed i.s that. rkii., i.s a business and liad no <br />pl.ace :in a resi.dent:ial. community. Mr. Vil.ancl poiirt ed out Chat under <br />Czty ordi.nance there are many home: occupations that are al.l.owed i.n <br />residential. areas. 'Ch:i.s i.s a busi.ness of: tatci.ng care of p<:ople~ and <br />~•roul.d be less obvious than some other home. occupations. <br />i~ir, Viland stated that Good Neighbor has been ~i.>sued a lic~nse [rom <br />Ramsey County on Uehalf oL t:he SCaCe Eor boarding ot' the el.derl.y. <br />N[r, Vi.lanct presented che Coimei.l caith ~ naclcet of letters< The <br />f.~Crst caas from Richard Ragan, Divi,ion of Envir.onmenCal. Nealth of <br />P.amsey County addressi.n~; the State ].i.censi.ng i,sue, Th~ >econd letter <br />is f:rom 13arbara 0'Gracly oE Ramsey County Publ.i.c Ileal.th Nur>ing Servi.ce <br />address:ing the i.nspecCion i.ssue. 7'he tlii.rd l.etter. i.s from Juc1y <br />Peters of: tl~e Nti.nnesota Associ.acion of lteal.C.h Care i'aci.l:i.ties <br />and is a letter of recommendation. <br />Pa~e -10- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.