09-14-83 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

?~[IN1J'CF,S C:i.ty Council Sept. 14~, 1983 Good i]ei.ghbor 'f.he Oity Attorney exp].ained that Che r~stri.ctive covenant that Home Care ltas been di.scusse.d would be m covenant on the title ot the ~ropmrty Centcr (Cont,) that the property can oril.y b<~ used f~or senior citi.zen> and ~i.f that use would cease then the property woul.d be 12-1. Tl~~i.s covenanC o~ouJ.d run between the City and the oo~ners of the propect,y. 'Che covenant ~oould appear in t:he abstract oF the property. ~M1es. Nardi.ni. poi.nted out that tJle. City has a prov:ision in i.ts code wY~ich all.ows a duplex to every 10 re.si.clential homes. ~7rs< Nar.cli_ni. poi-nr_ed out that i_f there are no othe:r clupl.exes ~,i.n the area, this hom~ could possi.bly becorne a duplex. Tv'arcl~i_ni staeed th2C sl,te has been a~a:i.nst this prov~J.si.on. Mrs. Scalze ,~>ointed oi.it thaC the restri.ctive covc,nant could be eppeal.ecl to n sub,equent City Council. `9r. Pai~ey staCed that the resericti.ve covenant coul.d ].imit the use to s~i.n„l.e ~Fainil.y and thziC ~rould precli,ide a duplex. i-(r. T'ahey sCatecl that :i.f the rest:ri.cCive covenant wcre ~~roperl.y worded, he sees no problem :if ttie seni.or use ~aould cease. P9r.Pahey staCed Ch~L the s~ituacion i.s one of balanci.ng betwe;Fn the nei.s;}iborhood anci the communi.ty. `-Ir. r'~hey slated that he feels Good ~1e7.~;hbor has made very e£fort to address Che concerns raised 1nd :i.f tne Ci.ty i.s wrori~~ in i.t~ i_nterprer.ation oF State 1aw, iC wi11 spPncl ei loC of: money fi.ndi.ng out, ~nd ~~i_11 also lose control of the issue as the SCate. wi.11 te11 the Ci.ty ~~~ha[ wi1~l go ~,i_n. r1r. Z~ahey asked if tl~e Counci.l.~aas i_n ~greement that a duplex should. be excl.uded. ;•1rs. Sca].ze stat:ed that the Council. could exclu<,9e tlae dupl.ex, but t11e riext purchaser of ~he property could requesC ;i.t. 'Che Attorney staked that the Counci.l. would have legal growuls to t:urn down a duplex wi.th a restri.cti.vc convenant< klowever, the Attorney st:ated that anot:her Council could remove the covenant, Mr. Porsber~ sCated Chat he was sti.1.1 not convi.nced that the Gi.ty had to a11ow Good Aieighbor Chei.r requesc. Pcr:;berp, stated t:hat 1~e di.d not feel a resi.dential neighborhood was tl1e, r~~roper pl.ace :Eor such a f'ac i l.ity. t4r. Paliey stated t:hat he had diff,;i.culey wlderstanding ~he concerns of the people on Sunr~i.se Dr~ive when the home proposed would be on lidE~~erton. t'ahey stated thaiC this saas no more a business thain a dup7.ex in tm R-1 ar.ea. ,Irs, Scalze re orted Chat she ~~ Addition-see minutes-9-28-83) P spolce to some prop].e at the Leni.sl.ati.ve T3ooth ~t the St1te ka~.i.r regarding t:he nurs-.(.n~; horoe i.nciustry. Scatze r.eported that some nursin~ homes are mal<ing prof:its oE i.000%. Sc~ilze reported tha[ peopl.e are o.iovinn~ ~into nursing homes as nri.vats pay:i.no and then for some r~asoi~ become MEd:icai.d pat~i.ents and must relocaCe< ~ The chief of Surveys and Compliance of the State Health Dept. and the Supervisor of Services Commission of the Public Welfare Dept. Page --13-