Laserfiche WebLink
t4TNU'CES <br />City Counc;il <br />Sept. l4, 1983 <br />~ood Ne:i.ghbor Nlr< Fahey commented that:,~ir. V4.lancl stated that tJ.~e major;i.ty of. the <br />Ilome Care neighbors ~.rere not opposed to the nroposal, h?r. V:ilanci rep].i.ed <br />Genter (Cont.) tY~at 11 or 7.3 neighbor.s stated t11at t:hey were not opposed eand <br />4 to 6:indi.cated sCrong support for the proposal. <br />?~1r. 'I'urelc in<licated that he wzis or,~posed to the pr.oposal ancl he <br />woulcl se7.1 his propert;y next to the 1oc~~C~,i.on considered by Good <br />Neighbor shou1.d Council ~~ive them zipprov2l to bui.l.do <br />Mr. I~ahey astced :if thc>. Counci.l den:ied t;l~e request if Mr. Turelc <br />xaould bui~d. Pahey poi.ntcd out th,.it ~if Counc,i.l derii.e> the request, <br />there could be a 1aw suit Chat may take some ti.mc to come to a <br />resol.i.iti.on. 1?ahey state.d theit ].ocal contx•ol was hi.s concern. <br />i~[rs< Li.ndau stated that they boup,ht their property w~.i.th tlie <br />understanding t11at the lrea caou7.d be si_ngle f~m~.ily. They wi.11 <br />build i_t the area i_s si_ngle family and owner-occupied. <br />?~1r. Fahey pointed out Chat the StaCe *v1.7.1 pr.obably address this issue <br />i.n t:he next sessi.on or the I.ef;i. ,lature. <br />Mrs. Scal.•z.e stzite<1 that she has no problern with the i.nspection <br />of tl,~e faci.lity, onl.y that Good i~ei~;hbor. ~ai.1.1 be pay.i.ng f.or it , <br />own i.nspecti_on. Sdhen t:he Stat.e :i.nspect; i.C> fac:i.l.i.ty, i.t: i.s <br />accountable onl.y to hhe taxpayer. Mrs< Scalze reported that the <br />Nursi.n~ iexv:ice w~il.;l. report to the Ci.t.y nnyth:ing th~zt i.t may fi.ncl. <br />Mrs. Nard;[n~. nointed out that on page 5 of the previ.oi.is Council. <br />meeCi.n~; m:inutes the °lanner stated that thi.s t:q~e of f:acil.ity i.s <br />no[ covered ~i.n Ci.ty ordi.nances, and, t:herefore, :i., prohi.bited< <br />The tlttorney comaiented that thF ordinance states thi.s, however, <br />courts are not: extremely hzppy t:o enf.or.ce such provisions. <br />`Qr. Simekstat:ed Chat he was opposed to the faicil;i.ty. Simek potinted <br />out Lhat the people on ei.t:her side oF ehe facil.ity wi-1.7. nof: bui7.d <br />i.t it goes in and thaC sYioul.d prove tSe effecC the facil.i.ty is havinf; <br />on property. <br />Mrs. 'Ci.mmons poi.nted out that there are two types o£ pur.chasi.n~ power. <br />~in real estat~, money and emot~.ional.< Ther~fore, th~is type of fac~i_li.t:y <br />~ai.11 deprec:i.ate surrowidin~ propert_y val.ues. <br />N,tr. Curtai.ek poi.nted out t:he double st2ndard i_n tl~e Ci.ty. The City <br />i.s trying t:o geC auto oody businesses out o.E residenti.al. areas, <br />buC tFien cons:i.ders a).lo~v~ing a bus:Lnc,s o,E Chis type in a res~identia7. <br />area, <br />Mr< Pranlc 3ert~1< stated Cl~at he was opposed to t7ic fac~.ility. <br />Page -15- <br />