Laserfiche WebLink
"[LtdU'CPS <br />City Coistci.l <br />Sep[. 1/+, 1933 <br />Canabury <br />PeCi.t:~ion <br />(Cont.) <br />The linnineer stated that he cloes not want t:o compLi.cate t:he matter <br />evith i:he State at this point as pertai.ns to the Sl.eepy 1-lollow project, <br />Thc F.n~;ineer reporCed Chat under t.he Sleepy 11o11ow project about hal.f. <br />of Vi.king Drive wil.l. be replaced and wi7.1 be widened Co the freewtly <br />fence. <br />The ft,ngineer reported that on Demont there are about: 10 houses ].ocated <br />on the n~axt.h side of the sCreet versus about 100 condomi.ni.ums Units oi~ <br />tl~ie south si.de. <br />A1r. Row7.and stated that i.f 50% of Che pro~~>erty owners want tl~e <br />improvemenT., t(~~e Ci.Cy shoulcl hold a heari.nr. T1c,P.owLand ~oi.nted <br />out that below Che Canaburq Condomi.ni.ums on Demont ti~e straet: <br />~aa, ~i.dcaned and storm se~aer i_nstzil.led. <br />blr. 3?aJ~iey pointed out that: Demont i.s a County road and the Ci.ty skiould <br />noC spend Ci.ty funcls to wi.den it. <br />Mr. PaPiey aslced who ~vi'll pay for the ~i.mprovements on Vilci.ng Drive, <br />The Engi_neer repli.ed thaC the improvement of the blaclctop cai11 be <br />pai.d unde-r the Sl.eepy ltolloca peojecC~ at l.ea,t half: of the cost. <br />'Phe P,ng:ineer commented that the curbi.ng would not be paid f.or uncler <br />Chis project. <br />Mr> Roi•il.and aslced that at least Ghe east sidc of the street should <br />b¢ tailcen care af uncler the projecr,< <br />Th~~~ ]~,ng:incaer stated Chat: he =.rastal.~~cino to the Coanty about Deenont. <br />P4r., G~l.anzer commented thlt he thou~ht t?'ie County woulct ~improve <br />tlie road :i.[ Che Ci_ty would take iC over. <br />TJ~ie clerlc st:aCed ttiat iP the Ci.ty improves Demont, the Ci.Cy can <br />enter i.nt:o an a~;reemenC wi.th the County on asses,i.nfl Che properCy <br />owners Lor Che i.inprovement:, <br />i1r< Glanze~r stated that the peoplc on the north of_ Demont do noC <br />cvant curbin~;< <br />P1rs. Scalze poi.nted out that we are paying Coun[:y t.ax do7.l.ars, <br />Scalze qi.iest:i.oned iak~y the City should assess i.ts people f:or Coi.inty <br />work that shoulcl be done. <br />~Ir. Powland suggesT.~d th~t it mi.ght help i.f tl~ie. condomi.n9.um owners <br />contacted the County. Counci.l. felt thi., was tt ~;ood i.dea. <br />Mr.. T'orsbern stated that the pr.'operty owners should not pay double <br />taxes. Porsberg fel.t that Che County should be leaned on and then <br />tPiey mi.~trt talce. care of. i.t, <br />Page -21.- <br />