Laserfiche WebLink
iHINUTPS <br />City Co wici.l. <br />Sept:. 14, 19II3 <br />:[mp. £33-19 Mr. Nielson replied that ~SP owned this property, <br />(Cont,) <br />'~1r. Pahey asked ~i.f t:he ylan caas revieweci rvi.tli the Pianner or iZn;~ineer. <br />Nir. Ni.elson staCed thaC iC was just ment~i.oned to them. <br />Mr. I~'ahey sCated that 1~c ctid not want to see anytk~:ing that wi.ll <br />jeopardize the future development of. the area. Mr. Pahey aslced if. <br />tl.~e Ci.Cy should r.equise thaC Che road end i.^ a temporary cul-de-sac <br />Co Greenbri_er. <br />~1rs. Nar.dini. po~inLed out that the co>t of Che :road through t:o <br />Greenbri.er would not warrent the development of: toro adcli.Ci.onal <br />lots. <br />'Ck~e PLanner staCed Chat Che third a'tter.native i.s ac<:eptable giver~ <br />Che fact that t:he property o~uner. to the west wouid not orant to <br />develop six lots. 'Che }?7.anner felt: tha2: thi.s i.s a decislon Chat <br />Ctie property owne~r shoul.d malce, Al.so the Planner stat.ed that the <br />Ci.ty must deci.de :i.f it wi_11. back the development. <br />Mr. ~f~'ahey stated that i.n the past thc City has not f.undFd devel.opment <br />wi.th Cax tlollar, for one developer. <br />yr. Nielson s[ated that the development would bene£i.t the property <br />owners whether they want the developmc~~nt. or noC. It gi.ves thein <br />opY.i.on, that they previousLy did not have. <br />Mrs. ScaLze staced that the City can rrqucst access to the south <br />w~i.t.:hout say~i.ng that ~the property owners to the south benefi.t;. <br />IC is just pr.ovidin~; for the Ci.t:y's welfare :i.n Che years to come. <br />~irs. Scal.ze stated that she does not see cnou,h benef:i.t to t!ie <br />C:ity to make it a Ci.ty project, <br />The Clerlc pol.nCed out t:hat .in Ci.ty projects s*reets are assessed <br />at 100% anci water and sewer at 80%. <br />P4r.. Ni.elson sttited tl~at the City's current pol.i.cy forces deve7.opment <br />to be h~indlecl by ~l~rge dFVelo~~ers and does not gi.ve the opportuillCy <br />to small developers. i1r. Ni.el.son stated that the Ci.Cy al.so r.eceives <br />the benef:it oC pi.clci.ng up addi.Cional. dsvc~l.opment. <br />~Irs, Scalze po4.nted out that the CiCy has ti~e second h9.~;h~st tax <br />rate and one of the reasons is t:hat i.t has pi.cked up assessment <br />percenta~es, <br />Mr.s. Scal.ce al.so pointed ouT. Chat NIr. LeMay mal<es out by pirtting i.n <br />a temporary cu~l.-de-sac. If the street ran sCrai.r;ht throu~;h, there. <br />would be more Lcont footage Co be assessed, <br />N[r., I~eMay poi.nted out t}~at che City fun<ted thc~ Syl.van li,tates <br />development for one developer. <br />Page -f3- <br />