My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-28-93 Council Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1983
>
09-28-93 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/27/2014 2:35:09 PM
Creation date
7/31/2009 2:49:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r~zN,rr~.s <br />c; e~~ c~u~,~~~. <br />SepC. 7F,9 1.933 <br />'Prain ,Latce F.d, 'Che Pl~nner. staCed th~C the property sl~ould not bc rezoned unl.ess <br />~(Cont.) the Ci.ty 1~as an inta*,rested l~uyer. iv~ith plans for the property, The <br />Planner a7.so reported that he *a5.11 advi,e Carlsburo of the City's <br />acti.on>. <br />McCumber 'i'I~e Planner reported t:hat: i.n a March 26, 7.980 letter :i.t.: stated <br />7.'ence (Cont,) th~t ei det:ai.led lanclscape plan should be si.ibmitted by ?~9cCinnl~er <br />be.for.e an occupancq permit 5.s -i.ssuede The landscape pl.an zoas <br />submitC~d but was det:ermi.ned to be i.nadequate< <br />'l'he City Cleric rcporte:d [hat thr-. bond mras retur.ned to N[cCumber< <br />Fahcy staC:ed that :i.f the bond was ret;urnecl, the Ci.ty mus7: have <br />approved evEryCh:Cng< <br />Sca7.zF cornment.e.d tt~aL- the fence werit i.n and the Ci.ty eissum~lth~2t i.t <br />would sCay. <br />Mr< ,7ohnson al.so repori_ed that. there :i.s a confLict: between he and <br />McCtmibr-.r about property l:i.nes. Mr. Torsberg r.eplied t.h.vt this is <br />a pex'sc~nal. matter between Johnson a~nd tlcCumber, <br />Mrs. Scal.ce suf;gest:ed thaY, the matter of the f:'ence be 1ef:t: i.n the <br />l,iands of Che Pl.anncr and R~iild~i.ng Tn,pector who o~i7.1. address ~i.t 1n <br />thc morni.ng. <br />Schr~ier Mr. Forsberg reported dtat Mr. Schrier h1s de[erm~i.ned t:liat under <br />Rezoning the ordinance hz; triangal ar Pi_ece of property would t:.<~ke l2 units <br /> wiCh R-3 zoning. <br />6lgenda <br />Item No. 12 'L'he P1.anner stated tliat he could have miscalculated Chis fif;ure <br /> due to m:i.scalculati.ny~ tl~ie s7.opes on tl~ie pr.•operty. The P1~nner <br /> sT.at: ed that i.n P~i., on~i.ni.on towrihouses woul.d be roore prac[i_ca1 for <br /> the property. <br />p4r. i~'ox•cber~; reportec~t tltat there cvill t~robnbl.y be some l.egal act:.i.on <br />a;;ainst the Ci.ty due t.o this rezoni.n;. <br />P1~.nner's T9r. Lic!~t: reported tti~t he or~iJ.l not 1>e at i,-1~e October 12 Cotiii~icil. eieetinY, <br />Rcport buc will. send a rep~e~esentat.l.ve, <br />P,`on-A~enda 1he Plrznner reported thait he has done ~n evaluaCion of Che three~ ,ite <br />Item No, 2 plans submi.tied by LeRoy LeMa~. Al.so kie has donc ~ summary oi <br />t.iic assessment pol.ici.es of some cleve:loping co^imun,i.ti.es. <br />The Planner commented that :i.n otAer communi.ties th<;re hlve been numerous <br />rc-tquests for approvail of canopies over ~1s i.slands. 'L'1~ie Planner reported <br />tl~iat the reque,st befox~e the Council pre-sentl.y wil:l requi.re a v<~rS.ance <br />as the. canop~ ~oould eneroach on setbacks. <br />I?age -15- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.