Laserfiche WebLink
Ali "t c <br />I"C. ~, __,.~ <br />Ci.ty Counc~il. <br />Oct. 5, 1983 <br />T~'ire I)e~t. . i~~r. Loc!<e reporCed thtit <br />;~udget, the: adopt,ion of Append;ix <br />CCo~~e.) <br />'~ir,. Sccal.~e a>t<ed i.[ t:he <br />in,urance premiwns. P4r, <br />ie ~i.nformed ~1e~. 1?yan over a yeai- ago that <br />J? was coining. <br />cost of t.i~te s~>t.em saoul.d l~e of,tset by <br />Loclce st_<~ted that; he d;icl not know. <br />t•4r. ]3oss k~o~inted out thnt: i.f the C,i.ty doe~s not: x'equi.rr-. hhese types <br />of tlt:ings, [:he Ci.t:y wi. Ll. have to ~Furnishi thc rnanpor~rer and equi~pment <br />t.o do thi.s f.or devel.oper.s, M.r. Loc].<e noi.nte~l out t:11~~t i~~~: a17. <br />btu lding, t}iat come i_n fx'om ~~iow on tir'e spr:i_nI<l.erecJ, tllr City cri7.1. <br />be able to no,t.pone putti.nf; lnotlier firr stat~ion on the othes si_<9e <br />oI thc (ree~aay. <br />p1r. T3oss }~oi.~~Ced out theiC: t_her2 t:h~ a~holo C;iV:y wi1.1 be sub,idi.ci.ng <br />t~ie peob~.Le:m, If t:he probl.em -i.s prevented, tkie C~i_ty G~i.J.l. not: have <br />to subsi.di.ze i.t. <br />'L9HG;. Ci.ty i`4e. Chtebc-c1c reported that: tl,te biic~;eC a~s proposed provi.des fpr a 7% <br />l.;udaet scilary ~i.ncrease f,or Ci.C:~~ emptoyees> <br />1•1rs. Scal.ze commented th~xt the seaiary propo,al st.ibmitted 'oy Mr, <br />C;lanzer wi, _i.nterc.sti.n~;. >r:~zl.ie ~,'ced Mr< G7.~vizer h;-s pl.ans [or <br />Che salary of t,he Cit:y's grass cuhter,~. tilr. Glan~c~° replied that <br />(~~~ i_ntended that tFiat. posi.tion stay at:ini.n~i.mum wage, '~Irs< Scalse <br />a};reed. <br />Ntayor (buncil The P~tayor Counc~il caCej;ory of: the bucld<st is propose.d at $£;0,1.00. <br />The Clerlc r.eporte<t t~at tl~ie l.ar~e :incr.~~~ase ~n tni.s ctatenory was <br />due to some c1te4;ory tr.an.;fers 1s reeornmendec' by the C~ity Aucl:i.tor. <br />~[rs. ucalze po,i.nCed out th2t the insurance bud;;eted for i_s a tl~ree <br />~ear px~ein~,iutri .tnd in Cl'ic next two years tnEre will be no money <br />bud;;eted f.or i.nsurancc. It saas po~int.~~d out thal tl,ie C;ity y.,ot m <br />better rate by payino a three year pxemii.imo <br />m~e Counci t. clecseasEd the nrnoiu~iC bi.id,v,eted for; the Attorney's ret~~~iner <br />by $(f~0 due to tL~e Counc~~~l's ciecr~asing t~e AtT.orney's civ:[1 reCai.ner <br />by fiSSE~ per rnorith. ThereFor.e, t:he amoiinl ~udgeted ~f-or hta}~ox~ Coimc~il <br />become> $7o,50q.00. <br />i2unic~ipal Cot.tncil w~s 2,P,reeablc to the S?2,450.00 budg;etect for 1.02 Muni.cip~~1 <br />Court CoueC. <br />T?1ect:Lons mhe City Clerk Poir~ted o~it that 19`34 wi7.7. be a Pres~.denti;A7. I;lec;tion <br /> year. Under elecCi.ons the Ci.ty has proposed $4,707, 'Che Clerlc <br /> reporCed that money was <br />renaair of the election buclgeted i~t <br />machinr.s, 7.9f33 ut~der i~lecti_ons for thc <br />Gouncil decided to aporove ].03 1;lect~ions as proposed. <br />~~BryP -6-. <br />