My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-12-83 Council Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1983
>
10-12-83 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/27/2014 2:35:21 PM
Creation date
7/31/2009 2:49:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
'`rLC,`r~;-p~3° <br />C,i.t~ Council <br />oc. r. . 12 , 19',.7 <br />'Lc~"a3 pro>osal rit ~1ielson po:i.ntEd out t?iac L~x1~~ibiC C provir'^, the ,~otcntial <br />(Cont:,) !_or de~.vc7.onment: Co the so~rth wi.tl~iout havin;; to ~~.<-,s anyone <br />uniil tney <irc ready Co de~~vel.op, <br />..9i ~'ai~ey po:[nted ouC that C-icy po,1 i_c~ h~i, been the,.C at 1~as4: <br />Lwo d.^-_vel.opers be i_nvolved for e~i E~ubl.i.c i.iuprovement, <br />~[rs. Se~1i~ aelceci if r~ic~. '.'ahFq w>> a;atnst T.he Ci.tq bond:i.n~ tor <br />Llie~ i.mprovement or the as,s~ssmr~ut poli.c~ of %30-20. ?ahcy sTated <br />Y.hnt 'te cL't.d not fec,1. Lhe ^~it~ shou~.~~ bond 1:or the. :i.rnprovemcr~t. <br />?dr -~.;:inson u~ 4~ested Chac the C:i_t~~~ coul.d deEcr th~ ~.ssessmenC: on <br />t u~'icha proncrGy. i9,r. ~~'?.c1_son poi.nCed out thac the C:i.ty would <br />havc C:o carry t':~sit ~~ssessmqnt~. <br />h`r ?n~1e~) SLstted that thc `~~1'7,000 coulci ~~~_ ~._ire2d ~ga=inst Cnc w,`.~olc <br />i.tnprovement. <br />?~~. i.r~Ai.ay ~Cated that a n;.cer develo+,nnent for [:he ci.ty ~ootald be <br />i?xll~ibit C. <br />`~ir. t;~i.e~son stnt:ed t}.iat if ti~e City wanCs Plan 2 ne ~.aou]d :l~i.lce the <br />1~; to the sout_1~ c!roj~ped ~i~ielson poi.rited out tiiat: =`~tr. 'cT~lay w:i.11 <br />br_ cii~,le ~o ~et ].2 1ot:> no matter ToPi~[> ~Ci_elson `elt Chat. ( at~zs <br />,Ci1'L the best ~,1ternlCi.ve. <br />h~~r. ^2hey agreed that P'.11n C w~is t:he best alternati.ve., but ~i.d not <br />SaanL Chc City Co laave Co pay for it. <br />dRi 7,e~~(ay pointed ouC C1~iaL t:here Fi'r.c some peoole on Al.tmn Ave.niie <br />~.aho *,aou7.d I~il<ez to d~-~.vel.o~> ti~c~i_r_ ,oroperty. - <br />t''r,. Nardi.ni point.:ed o~.it tt~aC the soutl,~e.rl.y ta~i7 h~s n~t to st~~y ~i.n <br />no mttCtex' *=~h:i_ch plari i_s ~.approve-d.. <br />~`4r< l~atiey poi.nCecl out T.ht~t tJie City Cler~ has reconnnended that the <br />Clty assess 1.00% for .~x11 riew streets, <br />Th~ Clerk pointed ou[ tl~e~t Cvie developer put iri Dianna Lano. ~tr, <br />Cn1cSE~ck recomrnen~i~d thz~t ~n L'iie fi.rture conCractors bz~. used for <br />street. itnpx'ove;rnent5. <br />;:4~ '?ahey stat.:ed that }~ie ~,a~s not 9.n Eavor of ra~isi_n~ C1~e t_ax ].evi.as <br />i.n orde.r to ma!ce mone~ ~for. z~ develooer. 7'he Cler!c poi.~ted ouC t:haC <br />if the pzo~~ect is ~_sessed 1.00% there caould bF no t2x 1_e~ry. <br />i'r 7c`~itzy ,>oi.rilecl ouC t;~~at the C~i_tq boncled ior t-u. 5+~7.van T~stt.ii:e, <br />~irnprqve.m~_nt. 4[r,~,. >catz,e r~;p~li.ecl Chat thc. reason the C~t:~ d~i_d t:hi.s <br />was that people ~i.n t:l,ze e~re<a waiit~d ;vat~r ~ncl to includc S~lvan .._t~ites <br />irx tkie px.oject cost the ~ity l.ess mone}~ and ;yl.v~ir~ ?stflte-s mor~, <br />,'aF;e -6- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.