11-09-83 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MTNa~rrs City Cotmcil Nov. 9, 7.9F3 Tax ]~orfeiled Mrs. Nardi.ni, commenCed that she felt a mistake has been made on the Propert:y parcel of. tax f:orf~i.tect nroperty that has been offered to the C~i.t:y< Nard~ini. did not feel that the property oorner woul.d have l et the Agenda property go t:ax de].i.nc~uenC Ior the amou of money that co as i.nvol.ved. Item No. 25 P9rs. Nardini. suggested Chat the Ci_ty Cler.l: cl~iectc i.nto the matter. 'I'he Attorney reporCed that the Ci.ty has 90 day, in whi.ch t:.o repl.y t.o the Couney o n this parcel. i4rs. Dlardi.ni. introduced the foll.owi.n~; resoluti_on and moved :i.ts actopt:.i.on: RESOi.,U'CION N0. 83-L1.-546 - TAI~LING ACTIOP] ON Tl~lli DIANNA Lt1~1L: TAX FORP'ETTPD Pi:OPL;RTY The forego:i.ng resolution was dul.y secondec9 by i'Nre PorsberY, Aqes (5) Nardin~i., Forsbcr~;, Hanson, Scalze, Pahey. Nayes (0), ]3esoluCion declared adopted. tihis resoluti_on appears .in Reso].ution Fiootc No. 9, Page 596. 7'he Att:orney r.eported that he has done some inv~st.i.gati.on on this parcel ancl Che AudiCOr's Certi.fi.cate has been filed and the property owner's ri.ghts have been termi.nated, The Attonley reported that he i.s worlci.ng on the documents for the City in order that: the Ci.ty can talce acti.on on the parcel. 'I'he Ci.ty Clerlc renorCed Lhat there are li.ens ag,ainsY. Che propert:y. Bids i~or Sale The City Cl.erl< reported that the Gi.ty recei.ved no b:i.ds on Che Of City sale of: the C:ity property Located on Demont between Liorrison and Property Savage. Agenda Mr. I'orsberf; commented t:hat there were too many cont:in~enci.es conta:i.ned Item No. 26 in the off.er that the City recei.vec9 previ.ous to off:eri.ng the property publi.clye D1r. Hanson suggested that the City just l.eave the for sale sign on the property. The CiCy Cl.erk reported that there are sti.ll people calli.ng on the properCy. The Uip.,gesC c~uesti.on that the CiCy i.s getCing i.s ~i.f. the City has a soi.1 test: on t:he properCy< ilr. Fahcy repLi.ed that a buyer shoul.d pay for. a soil. test on t:he property. y~c. Porsberg Eelt. th~t the C.ity's mi.ni.mum b:ic' was too h:igh. i4rs. Scalze ~sked what a soil test wovlcl cost. 'Che E'ngineer thought :iC would cost about ~500. Yag,e -7.6-