Laserfiche WebLink
^1INU7'I?S <br />Cit:y Council <br />Nov. 9, 19E33 <br />Wages (Cont:.) Mr. Fahey suggest.:ed that the salaries of Joe CheLbec(c and Annette <br />Preeman be increascd-kp-4°kr by- 2to 3% ( correCtion-11-9-83) <br />?4r, Pahey ~oi.nted out t11at he was propos~i.ng a salary increase Por <br />Joe Steele of 7.0% and Mr> Gl.anzer sug~ested 7.2%. Pakiey felt: thaC <br />10% was more sul.table due to the current economic situat:i.on and <br />tkie fact that 21r. Steele has onl.y been o~ich the Ci_ty a coiipl.r o£ <br />years. Pak~eq al.so pointed out t:haC the ci.ty pr.ovides LmiSorms for <br />t:he Publi.c G!orlcs employees. <br />~1r. i~ahey suhg,ested that the City grant: Dan Drake a 4% salary <br />i.ncrease from $9.00 per. hour 4:o fi9.7_5< Pahey pointed out tl~at <br />he ciid not feel. Mr. Dr.alce sl~ould receive t:he same treatment as <br />the other employees, but should recei.ve some i.ncrease. <br />Fahey po:inted out thaC the rate of: inLl.ati.on was about 3.5%. <br />nrs. Scal.ze po:i.nted out that at budget t:i.me the Counci.l. d~.iscussed <br />bas~ing i.ncreases on mer:it. <br />P1r. Pahey commented tfiat 9.t is hard to do something di£fetent for. <br />one employee, but there :is something to be said for giv~ing cle~~r <br />si.~;nals. <br />Mr. I'orsberg pointed out that ctur~i.n~ Che next; year the employee wi.11 <br />either do tl~e job or the si.t:uat:ion will be taken care of. <br />i1r. T~orsber~; sttited that ne agreed with the recommendations for <br />Ptrs. Jespersen, i4rs. I~l.essner, P1r. Steele and a~v% i.ncrease for <br />all other ful.l.-time empLoyees. <br />Mr. I~ahey poi.nted out that ~i.n Che case of. hir. Glanaer, the City has <br />granted somr_ over-ti.me pay and furnishes uniLorms and a truck. <br />Fahey stated that with the current. rconomi.c si.tuation he feel.s /o-% <br />is a fair i_ncrease. <br />Krs. Scalze agrced and po~.inCed out ChaC the C~.ity i.s al.so rece~i_vin{; <br />cUtSe <br />t1r. P'orsberg pointed oiat t_hat a 4% increase For some empl.oyecs is <br />more than f.or another employee. <br />T.~[rs. Scalze sug~;ested tliat the Councl.l conside~r i9r. Glanzer's <br />recommenda[:i.ons on salaries for ternporary he1p. Glanzer i.> recommendin~; <br />a mi.ni.mum wa~;e Eor the first: year's emp].oyment and a cei.l.i.ns; on <br />Che wage after five years emp].oymenC. Mr.. G1lnzer commented that <br />he does not wzmt to encoura~;e temporary hel.n t:o return to the Ci.ty <br />year after year. <br />TQr, P'akiey stated that he had no problem ori.th Gl.anzer's pronosal.. <br />pa~;e -19- <br />