|
t:(T\~U'1'~~S OT' '('~IP, i~?Oi~P.i(IOP pii~,f;,7':I'dr
<br />C"C'Cy CpUVC7.L
<br />Ll'C'PI,P CA\Al)n, ~:~I~iq~ESO'C~.
<br />November 30, 1583
<br />Pursuant to d.ize ca11 and notice t:hereo~: a worlcshop ninFti.ng o.f, t}ie
<br />Counci.l. of t.he Ci.ty oL Li_t~le Can_ida, ?4:i.nnesota was held on f:he
<br />',Ot1i dtiy o,f. A]o~~ember-, 1933 in the Coimc~i.1. Chambers of tl,~e City
<br />Center 1.ocated at 515 L:iCtl.e Canada 'Zoad :in sa:id C'i.ty.
<br />"?4ayor t?~nson cl~iaired the rneeti.ng and clll.ecl i.t Co order at: 7.10 P.Nf.
<br />and Che f:oll_ow:irxg aece present at ro1.1 c27.1s
<br />....:.,qr3t;",..5 "RIZSI~N'C;
<br />nr,so T>,;rsr,,.~c:
<br />t4ayor
<br />CounciLnan
<br />Counci.7.man
<br />Counci.l.~oom~n
<br />Oounci_].woman
<br />Cic~v cl.erk
<br />qeputy C1.er,k
<br />C:i.ty Aucli.COr
<br />.".e~cordi_n„ Secretary
<br />hir. Raymond ?tanson
<br />P1r. I^i.chael. Fexk~eY
<br />irtr, D~nn~i.s 7"or,berg
<br />P'rs. ~Su~;, Nardi.ni
<br />C-trs. ~;everl.y Scal.•r.e
<br />Nrr. Jos~~p}i Ch7.cbeclc
<br />Mrs. AnnetCe Preeman
<br />ie[r. I3ob Vpt:o
<br />Mrs, Kat_hl.e;en Cl.anzer
<br />Non--Resid.ent `!!r, 13ob Voto presented tl.ie Counci_1 o~iCh a proposal foe c1~2rg:ing
<br />Connecki.ons non-resident; connecti_on, to ehe Ci_ty's sc~aer and water >ysterns.
<br />To >ecar-_r & Ms. Voto exp7.ai.ned chet the pro~>osal toas deve7.opecl jo:i.ntly by the
<br />Water Syst~m City C1er1c,C,ity Attorneq, Ci.ty Tn~;ineer. and h~i.mse7.f.
<br />9oto expla~ined t1~aC under the. pro}~osal, non-resi.dent:s would be
<br />charged ,(or a pori:ion oF the CiCy's ioster t~.o~aer, ].i_fC s[aCi.ons,
<br />extra pi.pe s~.iz.e, i_f necessary, and th~ 20% of asscssments picl<ed
<br />ttp by tax levi.es.
<br />T'Ixe Aucli.tor explaine.d that the proposal was consldered Erom Che
<br />aspect of cohat it woul.d cost the develope:r, :i.i locat:ed in Litt:le
<br />Canada, for. Cl~e coruleeCion of secoer ancl wziter.
<br />The proposnl. sets out two tees, one for lateral. charf;es, that i.s
<br />front foot assessment, ancl tt~e other for a tr~~rilc fee, th~it uased
<br />on l.ineal. 1`oot factors, uniC char~;es, esf_:i.matcd ~isse.ssed valiaat:ion
<br />and tlte equ~iv2l.ent tr~mlc tax 7.evy Ezictor.
<br />Mrs. Scalze poi_nte~1 ouC that tl~ere are tcao non-r.es~idei~i[: projects on
<br />Ax'c~ide SCreet, one beiri<.; l.ots wi_th front: fooCa~;e, and the oCher ~i
<br />1.2 1oC devel.opment soith only 60 feeC. o£ f.ront footage. Mrs. 5cal.ze
<br />asl<ed ho~a the formula zoouJ.d apply to these projects.
<br />'Che City Cl.erlc repli_ed tl~at in ttie case oE thc project coitl~ 60 feet uE
<br />Eroritape, the assessed valuation woulcl be used, 'Che Auctitor staced
<br />tha~ th~~ ~,[:Lv~ 1ot:s wi.th frontage ~•roa7.d be cl~ar~;ecl on m footage bas~i.s,
<br />and the other on an evaluat.~i.on basi.s. $oth projecCS woutd be charged
<br />£airl.y under tl.-ie proposal.
<br />~raoe -1.-
<br />
|