Laserfiche WebLink
razNtrr.rs <br />Ci.ty Council <br />Jan. 11, 7.984 <br />Planni.ng The forego:irtg resolution was duly seconded by Mr. <br />Commission Ayes (5) Nardini., F~lanson, Porsber.g, Scalze, Pahey. <br />(Cont.) Nayes (0). <br />ResoluCi.on declared adopted. <br />This r.esolutioz~ appears in ResoLution I3oolc No. 10, <br />Hanson. <br />Yage 20. <br />t4rs< Sytces asiced if the City sets a deadline date for the receipt'of. <br />appl.ications. 'Che Cler.k reported that there was a deadli.ne date of <br />January 5 for the 1'7.anni.n~ Commission appLicati.ons, <br />P9rs. Sykes pointed out that two of: the ap~Lications did not meet that <br />date. <br />The Ci.ty Clerl< commented that thi.s is not regulaCed by ordinance, <br />buC was just a policy of the City. The Clerlc reported that the Counci.l <br />has talcen appl.i.cations Lrom the f.l.oor in the past. <br />Mrs. Sylces statecl Chat i.t appears that the Counci.l could recru:i.t <br />appl.i.cations anc( thi.s interferes cvith the f.airness and openness of <br />the process. <br />Kr. Flanson aslced the procedures i.n other cities. The clerlc responded <br />that they just tal<e app].i.cati.ons wi.thout a deadli.ne. <br />Mr. Porsberg commentect thaC the purpose of the deadline was to get <br />Che inf.ormation i.n the. Counci.l agendas. <br />Mrs. Scatze stzited thaC it puts her at a disadvanta~;e when Chere is an <br />appli.cati.on from an indivi.dual that she doesn't lm ow. <br />Mr. Davison stated that hi.s app <br />this should have been a cut and <br />tai.nted the process. <br />Mr. I~ahey agreed. Fahey stated <br />deadl.ine. Fahey stated that if <br />side of openness in government, <br />to to apply. <br />~i.cation met the deaclline and f.e1t that <br />dried ~oli.cy. Davi.son £e1t that this <br />that the City should li.ve by the <br />the City errs it should be on the <br />however, by allowi.np., anyone who wants <br />Mr. Forsberg commenked that just because the City had tcao appli.cants <br />for three openinns, does not mean that Uoth applicants woul.d have <br />been appoi.nted. <br />Mr. Sweeney stated thaC the City's ordinance does not set up a procedure <br />for. thi.s and that i.t is done by Cotmcil. directi.ve. At thi_s poi.nt, <br />the Counci.l can accept applicati.ons and appoi.nt ~ahomever the majority <br />choses. <br />Mrs. Nardini felt that the deadline poli.cy should be established for <br />next year. <br />Pa~;e -12- <br />