Laserfiche WebLink
rtzNUTes <br />c;.cy coUn~ll <br />Jan. 11~ 1984 <br />Water P1r.. lianson suggested that the situation be explai.ned to Mrs. SCewarT. <br />Servi.ce that i.f the City r.ef:unds the assessment: and the property i.s ever di.vided, <br />(Cont.) the cost of. the stub will be reassessed at current cost. <br /> Mr. Hanson intr.oduced tlie following resolution ~nd moved its adoption: <br />i:I'sSOLtJTION N0. 84-1-?6 - GRANTING A RPPIJND ON <br />ONF WATGR SGRVIC~ PLi1S 5% INTEREST 'CO MRS. STF[dART <br />AND TNSTRIJCTIDiG Tg~T Si~IF I3E INPORMED THAT SHOCiI.A <br />SH[i, AT A LATER DATF,., DIVIDIi TFII? PROPERTY, SHE WILL <br />fIAVF. 'CO PAX POR A WA7'tR STilR AND POR A SPWFR STUf3 <br />AT TODAY'S RATES <br />The f.orego~ing resolution was cluly seconded by Nlr. Torsberg. <br />Ayes (5) 13anson, Forsberg, P'ahey, Scalze, NArdini.. <br />Nayes (0), <br />Resoluti.on decLared adopted. <br />This resolution appears in I3esolution Roolc Dlo. 10, Page 33. <br />Watermai.n Mr. Torsberp, submitted to the Council a report outli.ni.ng the costs <br />Ureak i.nvolved i.n repai.ring a recent watermai.n break. Mr. Forsber~; reported <br />Report that Ci.ty staff. handLed the joU wel.l. and as qui.ckly as pos,ible. <br />Agenda ~4r. FAhey questi.oned why the break occurre.d and why the job was not <br />Item 11..4 done ri.ght to be~;in coiCh. <br />~1r. ]~orsber~; reported Chat it was a temporary line Chat was invo].ved, <br />"one that the City had anticipated ~.oould be extended to ~Iadnais Ileights. <br />Thi.s never happened. ALso there was a pr.oblem wi.th soil condi.ti.ons <br />i.n the area. <br />Mr. F~ahey questi.oned that a temporary p2t:ch could be put on a 36-i.nch <br />water line, and aslced cohy the l.i.ne eaas not permanently capped off i.n <br />the f~ir.st place. I'ahey asiced if the i'sngineer had any r.espor~sibi.l.~ity <br />for this. <br />Mr. Carley repl.i.ed that the line cvas i_nstal.le<I over 10 year.s ago and <br />i.s a part of. the main l:i.ne frorn St. Pau1. <br />Fahey poi.nted out that Juran & Moody just had Co pay dama~es Lor. a mi.stalce <br />they made, and aslced if Che Fnginer.r was responsi.bl.e for Chis ~•ratermain <br />breatc. Pahey asked i.f Che Ci.ty shoul.d obtain an independent opi.nion on <br />this. <br />The City Attorney poi.nted out that he carries insurance for any mi.sCakes <br />that he might matce. The Attorney stated that shoulct a cl.ai.m be made <br />against his offi.ce, he would have to determi.ne whether or not to pay <br />it out-oL-poc(cet or submit i.t to his insurance company. <br />Page -19- <br />